I'm sure your heart is in the right place—you're certainly earnest—but it's clear you're not very familiar with the subject. I'm not being dismissive, I just don't have the time & inclination to bring you up to speed.

Things are tough all over. Why aren't South American or non-Muslim African countries that are former colonies experiencing the kind of violence you see in North Africa and the Middle East? Why aren't people from Guyana murdering people in France and Belgium?

What does Christianity have to do with anything I've said. Let's not get distracted here and act like the Fox News fans who think bad news is just fine because MSNBC does it too.

I'm not looking for anything concerning Muslims. I object specifically to the [mis]use of a politically loaded term. Now please stop being repete66211ophobic in my safe space, because your microagressions are triggering.

True or untrue, your comment is a non sequitur and doesn't relate to anything I've said.

They should use the term "Islamic terrorism" because it's accurate. If someone bombs an abortion clinic in the name of Christianity then it should be called "Christian terrorism".

So a person who decides to blow him/herself up on a crowded street has no agency? He/she is simply following the natural course of post-colonialism and under-employment? The presence of Islam has no correlation to acts of terrorism?

Christians do kill people all the time. The distinction I would make here is they do so FAR less frequently *in the name of their religion*. Furthermore, the rate of those Christians who approve of violence in the name of their religion is significantly lower than among Muslims.

Haha, yeah. No correlation between violence and Islam. None at all. /s

Inclusion of the term "Islamophobia" mars an otherwise perfect review.

It can't be worse than what he did to the Jew in that other movie he made.  That kid got ripped to shreds.