#corrections

Yeah, no. Not even in the same ballpark.

When someone is complaining about internet kneejerks being stupid, they’re being contrarian. It’s a fair assessment.

People can form opinions on the effort of reproduction or interpretation based on character designs. Character design is a pretty strong part of anime. Calling people stupid for making these opinions is itself stupid. Calling people nerds on a nerd website is also stupid.

“Either way, everyone assuming it’s gonna be horrible because some of the characters look different is fucking stupid and internet kneejerks are getting super exhausting.”

* What it’s like being a fan of the Washington Capitals

Missing the point

The problem is people don’t seem to enjoy having a conversation with you, and for good reason. Every single point they make is met with amazing conversation pieces like “So?”, or you doing mental gymnastics on your own wording to explain what you REALLY meant, rather than what anybody with common sense would interpret…

You’re not having a conversation about the topic though. You’re trying to shove your opinion down people’s throats.

Have you ever considered not being so pedantic? Or outright unwilling to see a fair point made by another human being, instead of never wanting to be wrong ever?

God damn, this whole thread is kind of sad. The people who claim they knew all along that you couldn’t meet people online are acting kind of delusional, basically ignoring context by hanging on to one tweet for dear life and ignoring the proceeding one.

There is a point where pointing out “micro-aggressions” eventually causes your articles to receive eye-rolls and sighs. If people perceive you as getting professionally offended on a day to day basis, you damage the cause you champion. That’s how you’re coming off to me.

Unsure if poster is berating Nintendo for sending a takedown notice or commending them for not sending a takedown notice...

That’s because the mods can only be played by direct copies of SC2, and lead to SC2 sales. AM2R would do no such thing for Nintendo. The difference between the two examples is so extreme it’s not worth bringing up.

Trust me, it’s not for no reason. Continue to be the easily offended, rather than address any issues people bring forth.

And you’re ignoring what I said when, if they give this guy a license to use the trademark, you’re going to get a billion copycat devs saying “me too” after the fact.

You need to get off the assumption that the context is always about legal terms. “Precedence” of Nintendo allowing developers to willy-nilly create remakes of their old works would be “Hey, since Nintendo didn’t sue this guy I can totally make a remake of Zelda 2 then.”

Just because they don’t have to protect their own IP doesn’t make them dicks for doing so. They have every right, as granted by the current laws of copyright, to not allow a precedent to be set regarding remakes of their classics.

Yeah, you lost it when you claimed melee is slow.

I mean, you did whine about why people weren’t understanding your charming brand of comedy. You also asked why people were oh-so-misconstruing your thoughts. I just provided an answer, take it how you will (apparently super defensively).