Yeah, because our biology hasn’t changed at all in the 10,000+ years since agriculture became a thing lol.

Reminds me of an old Mad magazine comic strip. A guy with a big bushy mustache is sitting at a table. He picks up a can of mustache wax, smears it on, and twists it into a nice handle bar. It suddenly goes BOING! And reverts to being bushy. He repeats with more wax. Still goes back to bushy. Last panel he is trimming…

Is there any way you can turn this quick, concise, and accurate summation into a listicle with no less than five slides? We’re hurting for more content, and we really need to “drive engagement” so if you can say anything controversial or willfully obtuse and/or inaccurate, that would be a real plus!  We will gladly…

Save yellow pillows and let your ears gunk up till people can visibly see the wax. Two pieces of advice from this past week on this site. “Lifehacking” is gross.

Eargasm is the word you’re looking for.

If god didn’t want me to clean out my ears with a qtip why did he put a button in there that feels oh so so good when I hit it?

Counterpoint: No. Just don’t be an idiot.....

We aren’t designed to sustain fasting for days as a normal occurence. We are designed to eat when we are hungry. As a matter of fact, our bodies will retain fat if we go without food for too long. It’s a response to hunger. If our ancestors went without food for days, it was due to a shortage of food, not because they…

Absolutely yes. And you can set the “notifications” to just be a little numbered badge on the app, not a noise or other “alert,” so when you choose to pick up the phone, you can just look to see if you have a new email/text/etc., but it doesn’t distract you if you’re not actively looking at the phone. 

This is a really good thought, and I wish I’d thought (and written) it.

This. A lot of people kind of miss the point regarding time based restriction and simple caloric based restriction. You’re gonna lose the same amount of weight if you eat the same amount of calories either way. The problem is that some people have a hard time with maintaining that deficit if they can eat whenever they…

Which seems obvious to most? Intermittent fasting makes it easier for some people to be in that caloric deficit though.

You were in a caloric deficit therefore you lost weight. Intermittent fasting allowed you to be in a caloric deficit so you could lose weight. However, if you were in an equivalent caloric deficit WITHOUT intermittent fasting, you’d still have lost weight. That is what the study is saying.

The theory however is wrong. All benefits of time restrictive eating are a result of caloric restriction. There are peer reviewed high quality studies showing this, they’re in agreement, time restrictive eating has no physiological difference in the long term on human health as opposed to any other form of caloric…

Nice mechanistic theory. Literally no study supports this. The insulin model has been discredited countless times. This is quackery. I eat over 100 grams of sugar a day and over 300 carbs most days, while maintaining 13% body fat and have lost and maintained over a 60 lbs of fat loss. If your theory was correct that…

Cite her. You had to cite her, not site her.

Well I started doing this independently from her, but had to site her so people did not accuse me or plagiarism etc. (But yeah I don’t like her as a person, but she is right about cheeseburgers.)

Chrissy Teigen is a shitty person. Stop taking advice from her and giving her attention.

Ah yes, as long as cars are killing any wild animals it’s ok to poison them too.

You forgot loosening the lid on a larger can of WD40.