Doesn’t matter; the churches will get the funds. The Trinity Lutheran decision was an unprecedented sea change in the way that the Establishment Clause is viewed by the judiciary, a terrifying departure from the traditional interpretation of the past 200 years. Prior to the decision, giving tax money to churches was…

The subject that seems to be missing here is what to do when the streaming income goes away. The public is nothing if it isn’t fickle, so what happens when your popularity flags and the money goes away? On any resume this is just going to look like a long period of unemployment and explaining it would only worsen that…

This Banff?

Of course not; atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods. But from the legal perspective it has to be considered one for the purpose of protecting people that identify as atheists. Regardless, expressing bigotry towards a minority group on the basis of religious grounds is religious bigotry.

The meaning of religious bigot would be someone that is bigoted on the subject of religion. For example, you just showed yourself to be a religious bigot.

Yep.

Isn’t Steve Harvey also a huge religious bigot?

I’ve refused to play multiplayer games since I was young, mainly because nothing about that gameplay style has any of the things I find rewarding about video games, but I can tell you why I cheat, and why I do so a whole lot more than I use to: I’m not 20 anymore. I simply don’t have the time to invest in a lengthy…

I loved everything about it but the gameplay; I have a hard time thinking that needing expert+ skills at the game to break even with the RNG isn’t really gameplay. I played it for a long time then loaded it up with mods to ease the gameplay and ran through the ending.

Nope. It is simply understanding the nature of legal precedent and not letting vitriol rule your reason.

I’m not sure you are in the right place; your reasoned, well thought-out analysis and respect for the rule of law are out of place. You are suppose to foam at the mouth to show us your conviction here.

I’m not sure if impeaching Trump would be a good thing at this point; aside from appointing Gorsuch he has accomplished next to nothing and seems fundamentally incompetent. While he is a steaming, hot pile of garbage I would also point out that Pence is essentially the same on every stance, the only real difference…

They were erected mostly in the 1920's due to a rising tide of white supremacy at the time.

The thing to bear in mind is that a lot of these statues were erected in the early 20th century at the height of a white nationalism movement, not at the conclusion of the Civil War, which seems to be what most people assume.

I can’t remember who said it right now, but the statement, ‘No cause is so pure that it hasn’t attracted its share of fools’ seems to bear mention, at least the underlying logic that it is facile to attribute the specific to the general.

Agreed. I would say though, if SCOTUS changes in the terrifying non-zero-chance ways it could over the next 2.5 years that gives me nightmares and makes me drink Pepto throughout the day, then they might be very willing, even eager, to wade into this area of the law as well as several others that they have…

Nailed it.

Agreed. It sounds interesting, abstractly, as a work of art, but by the same token, based off of this review, who on Earth would want to play it?

All fair points, although I think that there is sufficient room to reasonably warrant suits; I don’t think that there would be any dismissal, so it might be more legal heartache and expense than anyone starting the coffee shop would care for. There might be a set of particularly favorable PA laws out there, though.