They claimed it was because their comments section was littered with trolls. Easier to blow everything up than, you know, actually moderate anything.

Colorado currently has 2 measures on the ballot (one for federal house districts & the other for state house districts) that would amend the state Constitution to prevent the state legislature from redrawing legislative districts. The amendments would create a bi-partisan committee to redraw and approve any district…

You just reminded me of another stolen (but completely accurate) bon mot:

Hey Coach Tomsula!

As someone more clever than I has previously stated:

To be fair, she had probably just finished watching C. Thomas Howell’s tour de force performance in Soul Man.

Yeah it would be amusing if it weren’t so sad. They can’t even commit to following up on their half-baked comments.

“I am Andrew Daisuke and I approve this message”

There are plenty of well developed, good countries that were a lot closer to the caravans origin than here.

No shit, Sherlock. Obviously we live in a complex non-binary world.

Thanks for the pro tip. Now I really miss not having surround sound anymore.

I remember that as the moment my searing hatred for all things Joe Buck was born. It was hilarious how much he lost his shit after that Moss celebration.

Tom Morello tore Paul Ryan a new one, essentially saying “keep our name out yo’ mouth” when Ryan mentioned that RATM were his favorite artist (ah, the irony!)

I doubt either of the two posters asking you these questions were asking them in good faith but your responses were well-thought, poignant and moving. You are a saint.

I would love to force the US delegation to the UN to use its veto power to prevent oversight into our elections. That would be a good face to present for the world.

If you actually believe the basic premise you wrote you are a reductionist moron incapable of critical thinking and your opinion on anything should be disregarded.

You’re not wrong, but there’s plenty of blame for our current political shitshow to go around.

Serious question that I’ve asked multiple times, with no response (probably because I’m perennially in the greys unless responding to someone):

Isn’t it against the law to destroy anything that might reasonably be considered as evidence in a forthcoming trial, even if no such trial is currently pending?

Correction: two kids stacked on top of each other, with the top kid wearing a blobfish on their head: