recidivicious
recidivicious
recidivicious

She’s not right. She is against background checks, and is using the idea of blanket indictments as gun control. She’s essentially arguing *against* the second thing you said. I don’t think the watch list should automatically prevent someone on the list from owning a gun., but it might warrant further investigation on

I was thinking his facial expression looked like a poop strain too! Dude needs to get some more fiber in his diet.

I once found my cat happily batting an unwrapped, unused tampon around the bathroom. I still have no idea how she got it out of my purse, let alone out of the wrapper.

This post kinda makes me want to take a Silkwood shower. Just... no. This is gross.

Whoa. You are completely missing the issue. Carly Fiorina is advocating no background checks and just mass-indicting people for no reason at all. What I am saying is that you can’t indict anyone without first having something to indict them for. And that if our politicians actually could all be grownups at the gun

The gladiator in boxer briefs with his “Mi Vida Loca” and Virgin Mary tattoos on full display is the best.

We really do sometimes, although it isn’t quite that simple here. The US was not a member of UNESCO in 2001, when UCH was drawn up (we dropped out in 1984 and didn’t rejoin until 2003). As far as I know we’ve never insisted on anyone else adhering to it either. Unless a wreck is in our waters where our government can

No, I’m not saying that at all. I’m saying that a crime has to have occurred for someone to be indicted. You can’t indict a person for something that hasn’t happened.

Well, just to use Fiorina’s example here (yeah... I know...) if someone is on a watch list of any kind, that should throw up a red flag during a background check. Now, she also seems to be arguing against background checks and for just mass-indicting people on the watch list so they can’t get any guns. One of those

So did I. :)

I’m just worried that it’ll all go wrong somehow. We have a bad habit of failing to go for the jugular when we should.

That’s it, I’m gonna patent Trump Bigot Bingo: the game. It’ll be sort of like Cards Against Humanity, except you don’t have to complete a phrase offensively, Trump will do it for you.

What is this “you guys” and “us”? Seven Tejanos died at the Alamo, and a company made up of Tejano volunteers rode with Juan Seguin from San Antonio to join the Texan forces at San Jacinto.

YES! Dead Milkmen, automatic star.

Yep, exactly. Indictments aren’t like Halloween candy, you can’t just hand them out. There has to be cause.

Yeah, in the article linked above there’s a really heartbreaking quote from Reeva’s father about how now that it’s really over they can finally start to move on with their lives.

Yes, especially on closing the gun show loophole. I hate that it even exists in the first place.

“If somebody is a suspected terrorist on a watch list, they can be indicted at any time, and once you’re indicted, you cannot own a firearm.”

That was exactly the judge’s logic here - regardless of who was behind the door, it was a reasonable expectation that shooting four times through it was going to kill that person.

Was she? Shit.