rebturtle
RebTurtle
rebturtle

They happen to be a contract vehicle for the government, so federal employees rack up some major miles on the Tahoe & variants. I’m not sure where they are getting their states from, and why it wouldn’t also include the Ford Pursuit vehicles. Perhaps they weren’t able to filter out the GM G-rides from POVs but were

I agree with the track. I understand the dad’s emotions, but he caused the track a huge liability, especially when he dove BACK INTO the burning car to grab or reach something. Also, can we stop hailing him as a hero who saved or “pulled his son out of” the car. The video is pretty clear. The son was climbing out when

Here’s a problem I see with that, at least in California and other high-density traffic areas. 3 seconds is ideal from a safety standpoint, but if you leave that much space in a traffic area you will have people cutting in front of you every 30 seconds, and every time they do it introduces new dangers. It is far safer

“ if you use it properly” And there’s the rub. Automakers and engineers can build all sorts of things, but the variable you cannot control is humans. No doubt dozens if not hundreds of people have died while using cruise control (in all brands of vehicles) and either becoming distracted, complacent, or falling

When was the last time an accident made headlines because the driver had cruise control engaged? Ford? Chevy? Honda? Toyota? VW? BMW? etc ad-nausium. Why are these being treated any different? I think the mere naming of Tesla’s driving-assist mechanism as “autopilot” invites more confidence and higher expectations on