If you don’t have to manually search for every reply in the 400+ comment Maverick article, what even is the point?

Dear Jalopnik and G/O Media in general,

Ah, so now we are likely looking at Toyota’s version of Subaru’s Soltera that was announced a little while back. I’m looking forward to Subaru’s front facia since Toyota screwed theirs up. 

Seems like the best version. Screw the mega screen crap.

I’m not even sure it’s a regulation thing. It might just not be cost effective to bring them over since they’re built overseas and wagons don’t sell well here.

Jalopnik slideshows--less reliable than an unreliable car.

This is in San Diego:

Thanks for the side view; it looks so much better. The initial front-view at the top of the article makes it look like a Corvette with a slightly modified front clip.

the subtle visual changes on this car make an already beautiful car even more beautiflu. well done.  Love how the spoiler integrated with the line on the side and the smoother lines around the rear windows.

“Grandma, what big teeth you have”

Thank you for not screenshotting the contributions this time!

Jeremy Clarkson ruined the Crossfire for me when he described its roofline as having the same curve as a dog’s arched back as it takes a shit. Can’t unsee that now.

If nothing else, it should have really unique sounding car horns.

They should put it in a drumset.

Everyone on this site: “I want a fast, stylish-but-not-overstyled, 300-400hp car with RWD, a manual transmission, and relatively analog underpinnings. I also want it for cheap.”

This is like the anti-Supra. Understated instead of over-styled, distinct nods to its heritage. Give it the 400hp TT V6 and a stick, price it in the low-40s to compete with the Mustang GT and undercut the I6 Supra, and you’d have to win hearts and minds of enthusiasts everywhere, right?

The original IS came out in 1998/1999 so probably not lol

How much krill does it consume while driving?

I think you need help;