rd73
1011110111010101
rd73

He can fuck me straight to hell....

Just said this...what is more likely? That people 20 rows away were clapping because the flight was no longer delayed and they didn’t know the details? Or that people 20 rows away were like “fuck that kid with allergies and his stage 4 cancer father! woot! burn in hell!!!! can I get an amen for that???”

So, there is zero evidence that anyone knew he was having an allergic reaction who clapped. Undoubtedly they were happy that the delay was no longer a delay. I mean, yes. If they knew all the facts and clapped, they’re assholes. But what is more realistic? That adults sitting nowhere near the family didn’t know what

And in all the societies you mention, women have fewer means of controlling their own destiny, relative to men, than in the US. Even in “Chiraq”.

Well, as a modern viewer of the play, the play taking place in a somewhat imaginary world (I realize ancient Greece existed, but to me, the day to day is relatively imaginary) is something I can accept on its face as exploring a topic - the power of the pussy over men. I might roll my eyes at how one dimensional the

Yes. I’ve seen the play. I am aware of its literary roots and I think it was still terrible.

Living in Chicago, I was disgusted by Chi-Raq. I thought he would overstate the issues of violence in Chicago with that movie. Instead it was like “we can solve all problems if women would just use their pussies to control men.” Fuck that.

Ok, please find me a link to her using racially coded language BEFORE the 1994 Crime Bill was passed (that she didn’t vote for). I can only fine racially coded language from Mr. Sanders before the bill was passed: “It is my firm belief that clearly, there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are

I like to think that he’s planning their first visit to a BDSM dungeon...

And Nader was able to make sure cars had seat belts without being president. We seem to forget sometimes that people can be very influential without being president. Indeed, Sanders could possibly be way more influential as Senate Majority Leader (if the Dems could regain control and he could lobby for that role) than

So...
Let me follow. Hillary’s supporters’ comments can be taken out of context of their careers, apologies and explanations ignored, and reduced down to a media summary. And that is awesome sauce.
At an official event, a man uses the “but but a female said it” excuse to remind everyone of a presidential candidate’s

I haven’t seen a real study of whether politics have cleaved right by objective standards or not. But I see the argument. I just don’t know if it is perception or reality because I think some backlash is due to the fact that some of the white, male, Christian entitlements are being shared slightly more broadly. And

I could interpret what you mean by that in different ways...so, how are you meaning that?

In 25 years, he never gained the trust of colleagues to be in a leadership position or to push through bills he wanted? And that is a good thing? Failure to achieve is a strength?

Well, since many of your examples are from non-divided Congress/Executive branch, they don’t really fit what I asked. Many of the rest are of a by-gone era when people lived in DC and got to know each other personally and could work with each other. Others are examples where there is a history of doing exactly x in

When details threaten ideology, ignore the details. Ok.