that idiot ex-military guy website you linked suggested shoulder mounted SAMs. Which basically means he is a worthless hack.

A single shoulder mounted SAM couldn’t take down an airliner half the size of a 747. Two of them wouldn’t either. Plus IR missiles would target the engines. At worst two missiles take out two engines, a 747 can fly on 1. Plus the pilot would have had time to send a distress call.

THE only way a SAM takes down an…

The tail landed miles away from the main wreckage. It was definitely ripped off first. Remember that chinese 747 did the same sort of erratic gain of altitude when it lost it’s tail section due to tail strike damage.

a) What motivation is there for shooting down TWA 800

In what reality does a SAM leave zero shrapnel damage? In what reality does a IR shoulder mounted SAM take down a 747 in one shot?

a) What motivation is there for shooting down TWA 800

If a plane is missing a horizontal stabilizer it would.

Holy shit, he thinks an IR shoulder mounted missile could take down a 747...

That site doesn’t answer my questions:

a) What motivation is there for shooting down TWA 800

a) What motivation is there for shooting down TWA 800

No, they aren’t. Shooting someone is the preferred method of assassination.

Any crash where there is a potential crime the FBI has a hand in. At first it appeared there might have been a bomb on the plane. Once they realized the real cause was a fault in the 747-200, one that was publicly known well before TWA800, it wasn’t a criminal case.

No, they really don’t do a good job. You have Russian hackers, hacking the presidents email and you really think the us government can keep a fuck up by the military a secret?

a) What’s the motive of shooting down the plane?

There weren’t hundreds of eye witnesses. You do realize that right? And like I said, they aren’t reliable. During MH17 eye witnesses claim they saw a Ukrainian fighter jet attack MH17. Did you know that there was a cloud layer below 10k feet that day in Ukraine? It would have been physically impossible to see anything…

Believing that every plane crash is a massive government conspiracy actually makes you the dumbest motherfucker on the planet. A government, that can’t keep anything a secret even when they try.

Or please, go ahead and continue to believe that a falsified report about solid rocket fuel found on a stolen airline seat…

Eye witnesses are horribly unreliable in airline disasters. Especially when they have no idea what they are looking at until after the fact.

a) The hole was blown from the inside

If there was only one explosion, it was when the jet fuel ignited. This doesn’t preclude foul play.

This is easy. Tail section breaks off due to shitty repair job, and maintenance. Explosive decompression, plane noses up, breaks apart and goes down.

What? We knew what took down MH17 almost within minutes of the plane going down. Russia continues to dispute the findings, but the evidence is there.