What’s the impact of a 3-year old lying? We’re not talking about lying in the abstract - we’re talking about the President lying. Because of his lies, people have died. I don’t care why he lies.

My Porsche has even less than that, and it’s a ton of fun.

7 Years in IndyCar: Average Start - 12.0 Average Finish - 10.6

I’m not a fan of Danica, but the amount of salt and “hate” in the comments for this chick, is just insane. The crash wasn’t even her fault since she’s had a twitchy/unstable car all race. If the car was more stable, she probably would of been more in contention. Maybe not win but a good finish.

Bummer. I always thought Danica was an underrated driver in general and a really good open wheel racer... I was hoping she was going to have a good showing today...

Talking of crap and popping a squat, dropping a deuce while making a grilled cheese has a certain je ne sais quoi.

In fact, Trump just did a massive favor to one of the companies accused of spying on Americans. So no, it’s not a genuine concern, it’s just typical Trump bullshit.

Blah, blah, blah. It reads as if Trump wants to engage in backdoor protectionism. And given what a simpleton he is at understanding the nuances of economics, he’s certainly living down to my expectations. Just such a shitstain...every day he finds new ways to denigrate the presidency.

I don’t think the goods/materials necessarily need to come from adversarial states but that either a sudden loss of supply or the fact of overseas supply meaning significant loss of production ‘at home’ could impact security e.g. aluminium from overseas is used to make warplanes and if imports dried up that would no…

What a fool. He wants to help ZTE sell phones here with known, Chinese govt installed and mandated back doors, but wants to crack down on cars and auto parts for natsec reasons... Just fuck this guy. Your president is a foreign agent, America. I don’t know how much more obvious it can get.

The ‘adverse effect on national security’ is simply an underhand means to impose tariffs without breaking WTO rules.

can we have an investigation into wich is the bigger threat to national security... foreign cars or the orange twatwaffle plox?

Given the chicken tax is still a thing (ugh) and the recent string of domestic attacks involving vehicles have been things like trucks and large vans, I would be more concerned that American vehicles are a threat to national security.

Seriously..get this dumbass out of office. With every thing he does he’s literally unraveling another thread of the republic. Like it’s universal stupidity that’s running the country right now.

It’s more than just phone communication. For many people, a smartphone is their only access to the internet. Imagine living without that. You can’t.

I say we get to hunt them like The Most Dangerous Game. Devos already looks like a deer caught in spotters lights, Sessions is well known to be a possum masquerading in a boys husky sized suit, I believe Mnuchin and Mulvaney are both already legally allowed to be trapped as members of the weasel family, Ross exploits…

I’m really not trying to argue with you, if for no other reason than you seem quite angry but I clicked on the link for the proposal and unless I’m missing something you have conflated brown/Grizzly bear rules with black bear rules and the article is accurate:

I fucking hate these people so much (Trumpco cabinet..and the thing himself) I think I am going to just have to get off the internet.

Well, psychologically he’s a narcissist, and in that mechanism, the self is central to every utterance, taken for granted almost to the point of being elided completely. Anything he says others feel or do are actually his own thoughts and actions.

He’s weirdo not even in the sense of personality towards a private interaction.