A Venn diagram:

I think this was actually why I never put crap in my mouth.

It never occurred to me a lesson happened here, but likely this kid will grow up to practice meticulously safe sex.

I had a roommate once - and this was the last time I’ll ever have one - and one time I found one in our fridge. I’ve been confused and vaguely insecure about my sub-par promiscuity every since.

As a Canadian, I’m terrified of it.

I feel very certain, and I mean this in the clinical sense of the word, that he has an anti-social disorder. Sociopathic. If you study his behaviour, his career, him...you’ll see it too. He has every sign in the textbook.

I hate elitism too, but at the same time, our culture already knows (or should know) that some jobs need upper-level education to prevent complex, very harmful errors. They absolutely should need college, or at least to pass examinations (so that smart, determined cookies can learn for free online).

On the whole, I totally agree with you. I just wonder, aren’t these trafficked children in the article? If they aren’t, it should be okay to give them money since it wouldn’t be contributing to the mafia. If they are, then their parents are far away, likely out of the picture for now, and the guardian may do much…

That really does sting. Tampons are the least luxurious thing I’ve ever purchased. I think I really mean that, too, no exaggeration. It’s a weird logic, and I’m wondering if toothpaste or deodorant or bandages get the extra tax too, since I would consider them more or of equal luxury.

I was hoping likewise that God would give Mr.Cruz a blue penis that burned to be used every time he cheated so that there might be a visible sign of his breach of trust.

I think we are in general agreement on this, given one of your other replies. If it turns out women don’t get tax-free razors to keep those silky legs a’ temptin’ then what we have is two sexes paying for razors, and only one sex paying for tampons. The argument they’d be making is so stupid I hesitate to believe it.

Do you find there is a potential and total lack of reading material out there someone may encounter? In the same manner a women may be covered in blood, cowering in her house and missing work (or in many countries, not attending school), there is the potential for a person to be degraded to this same degree by not…

Those don’t compromise dignity, it’s disingenuous to imply they do. I’m not sure why it’s relevant that Walmart is a private company? I was not asking to be saved by Walmart stepping in, just that they pay what they legally owe in order to continue to legally exploit the masses that may be legally buying toxic…

They may not push them up, because they’ve examined the market trends in Europe and may have found menstrual cups are ruining their market share. I don’t think they’ll want to push Americans into the territory, just as I’m sure pill companies are quietly freaking out over IUDs catching on. Not when the masses are…

http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInfo…

I’ve always thought it was weird we would pay, via tax, to ensure we aren’t poisoned by something someone else really wants to sell us. Especially something many of us are forced to buy. It punishes the potential victim, not the party that would theoretically be committing the evil.

Do UK women get off with no tax on theirs?

Well, the answer is that if human dignity is compromised by an absence of the product, it ought to be easily attained, enough that there is equality in access. So really, why can they not subsidize both?

See, I imagined it could be a compliment, too. Like:

Don’t worry though! Nigel says we’ll be able to use our keen emotional intelligence to sense the real victor is happy, and congratulate him with sophisticated humility! We still “win” too!