I’m not interested in a phone that doesn’t work while i’m a passenger in a car.

Right cause HGH is a placebo for athletes that doesn’t do anything and greenies have been scientifically shown to improve performance.

Its absurd to claim no-one is qualified and he in fact does not even try to claim so.

I think turning in a blank ballot should be treated just like a resignation letter.

Lap 1!

My experience is that special ed programs fight to keep kids. They fought mainstreaming my daughter for two years, so finally we moved to a charter school that would. Two years later she makes honor roll. She was diagnosed autistic.

It’s like the old saying, money comes and goes, but degens still have to degen..

Yea, you got it almost right. Car makers always have incentives to offer better gas mileage, because it makes cost of operation cheaper. But it has to balance that with cost of manufacture, size, storage capacity, and performance, and customer desires in all those areas. Car makers that are great at making high MPG…

Outrageous, lol. Both mortgages and student loans are heavily subsidized by our tax dollars.

Not fighting means the party is going to remain in denial about what a terrible candidate Hilary was.

My point is still valid with Ford making Expeditions and GM making Suburbans, they are forced to make small cars to sell profitable SUVs, you can’t rebut that.

That’s not Cap and Trade. Tesla’s credits are a socialist experiment by the Peoples Republic of California.

The best gas mileage any BMW 5 series gets in the US is 23 City, 34 highway with a 4 cylinder engine. The 4 wheel drive v8 is 20/29, the M series even worse, so in total the 5 series is probably average close to 25 mpg.

That’s right, CAFE is a huge tax on poorer americans. Car makers would build cheaper cars that better fit customer demands without it.

Presidential elections aren’t free markets.

Yea, none of this is true. Manufacturers always have incentives to offer better gas mileage. Their cost of ownership of s heavily determined by gas costs, and customers care about that even at relatively cheap gas prices. The difference is the market allows customers to balance gas mileage vs. comfort, safety, hailing…

“Cap and trade is smoke and mirrors. A company has a cap on CO2 emissions unless they buy from another company allocated CO2 that hasn’t used it? Tesla sells carbon credits to other automakers when it makes no sense for the company to HAVE carbon credits since it build electric cars.”

Sure but there are far more cost effective ways to reduce CO2 emissions, cap and trade is probably the best.

Again, its a terribly expensive way to reduce emissions. A far cheaper and better way would be to cap emissions, create a market and make cars (and power plants and factories, etc) buy the right to use part of the limited amount of emissions. Then your price actually matches the reality of the cost of reducing…

The stupid coastal home is already heavily subsidized by government disaster insurance.