You know...the phone we REALLY want is one that can survive a drop without a case. What is the point of a great looking phone if everyone has to bubbly-wrap it so it can survive in the “real” world.

This HAS to be tongue-in-cheek... and done to pull everyone’s leg.

“Publicly financed stadiums are a scam foisted upon taxpayers.”

“...Never forget that rich people are terrible....”

Probably the same way someone in a part of world who makes $5 a month can’t get why anyone would pay $6 for a fancy coffee drink.

So... the terrorists won then.

Clearly we are not paying attention...as it seemed so clear to everyone else.

We just shot ourselves.

This HAD to be tongue-in-cheek!!! There is no way this could have been serious...

The part about her being “smug” is probably the reason why she doesn’t give a fuck if you “dislike” her.

So one must be a saint before one should speak?

Yes... we definitely would have said “if,” if only we knew it would spare us from this inane conversation.

Which is why we said “when” and “efficient enough”... did we claim to have solve the problem? Any dolt knows there are issues with the suggestion, but thanks for explicitly pointing out the obvious ones.

Would also be cool when solar charging for quadcopters are efficient enough that they can fly, perch to recharge, and fly again...

Then there is this tabletop gadget called the GoldXpert: http://rainydaymagazine.com/wp/2012/02/16/…

Giving money to people just because they asked... what could possibly go wrong?

So was it suppose to be a dig at Scully? Not sure what you are saying... the Newton was a ground-breaker.

We reject the assertion that flying is expensive.

“...most efficient and best...”

That is SUCH a great idea, but would love to see more LED rings which can be fitted like a filter and hook to the hot shoe. Don’t understand why macro filter makers don’t do this.