rahulm2601
RahulM2601
rahulm2601

You’re not wrong on that one too...

1. Anyone that claims that 458 doesn’t sound good, is either straight up ignorant or values top speed and probably do not care about driver’s enjoyment because the 458 was built for just that.

Buying a Volvo is still thousand times better than buying from a brand that literally has its own fanboys bending over of it. Sure, Volvos today are mechanically sound and their interiors are handsomely proper, but I still think it’s an awesome brand with products that have actual quality and desirability to them.

So, sitting in a Model 3, which has the most inferior build quality and an interior so depressing it makes BMW’s and MB’s interiors look so upscale, which they always have been, is better than the established companies who have had tons of experience in building quality cars? I bet there are people that didn’t know

Well, truth to be told, if those customers had the money to buy a Phantom in the first place, they can afford the maintenance bills when it needs servicing or when something breaks. I say the Rolls Royces made today are brilliantly put and quality made beauties. They have this emotion when it comes to the design and

The Inline 6s would like to have a word. Even if other engines had problems, they’re still fun and sound great...

The E60 M5 V10 isn’t exactly unreliable. The only times you’d have crazy problems with the rod bearings was if you revved the engine after you cold started it. Other than that, sure it had HFPF issue a few times, but it’s probably still a mad fun car to drive. 

The reason why the Model 3 is selling a lot is that it’s got crazy demand to it and of all the hype musk got it. It does not mean that I hate Teslas though. However, I wouldn’t say BMW isn’t milking the brand or putting their future at risk, when they seem to have a lot of great EVs coming up with great technology.

Alternate point: The latest G generation models seem to be really promising to me actually. Sure they may have actually had a dip in quality during the very early F generation time period, but even then they still improved over the course of time throughout the later F variations. I’d say maybe give them a chance on

Nissan R32 GT-R. So underrated as well as a solid, fun daily.

Volvo is only owned by Geely, other than that, Volvo never shared platforms or parts with them. Volvo only uses the cash lent by Geely to build and engineer their cars. I really feel Volvo is doing a great job in general.

The ability to actually drive it, simple interior, quick charging rate, and great looks.

Sorry for the mistake!

ok I may have hurried through, but still got the point through.

What’s wrong with my post? It’s true about any car ownership and I’ve read my posts

What?

Still, not a lot of them are unreliable if looked after properly as well as driven hard. I can see you mainly talking about the 964 era 911s which happened to have coolant issues, but still can give the owner a lot of fun and less issues, if maintained, or better yet, bulletproof. Porsches overall can be as reliable

So are Porsches too. Just because Porsche are a bit costly to maintain, doesn’t mean that they are unreliable. Same could be even said about any luxury car. 

The whining has always been going on about the previous generations of the 3 series. The hype all started with the E30, yes I know that the E21 was literally the first generation, but it was the E30 carried the E21's spirit and style in terms performance and just how fun it was in the roads and it caught on with the pe

I hope many iconic nameplates retain the retro designs going forward with interesting engine choices as well. The Retro design is something that should be give attention. Had the new Supra retained the FT-1 concept design, it would’ve been much more interesting. Not that I have anything against the real thing, but my