radioactivebadger--disqus
radioactive badger
radioactivebadger--disqus

They're often the same fucking arena.

In general the music coverage isn't great. There are some good music writers on here, but the week by week reviews are handled by near-anonymous freelancers, and in depth pieces are getting more and more rare. O'Neal writes some really good stuff and has really broad tastes but rarely expands beyond the Newswires.

She didn't get any work until her mid-30s, so she's making up for time missed. Plus, she's perfect.

Right. He's a player playing with house money while all the other guys had to buy in. Though he's going to lose every time against Gilfoyle. And maybe Dinesh.

I'd say no. I watched it recently and it just seemed like a fail experiment where they were trying to balance a couple of different tones but which never fully gelling.

Deulofeu's loan has been renewed, and Barry making the move permanent is pretty much a given since City don't need him. The answer for everyone else is to plunder Newcastle.

or maybe you could wait 18 years till you are no longer a massive baby. It really could be that simple.

I was glad to finally learn which part of the bathroom was which, but even then I still wonder how much that matters.

And maybe bitching about a character or his involvement being easily exhausted isn't the best thing considering the actor recently died from a terminal illness.

I, on the other hand, welcome our new bitchy Indian overlord. The interplay between him and Gilfoyle is terrific.

He's making half a million per a year for two years with stock options. I'm not sure employment is the most immediate issue for him.

But your argument doesn't work if the people you're arguing against are idiots, barely better than straw men. You need to produce one where intent improves upon the meaning while also being supported by the text. An instance where something or some word was familiar to the author but readers would confuse it with

Part of the problem is juggling all the book characters and all the show characters, and sometimes you just need to syncretize them.

I don't really agree with some of your arguments about the mutineers but I absolutely agree with you here.

But part of it is they don't get a POV. The show's writers don't really understand the importance of the POV and the implications for the viewer and the reader, which is bullshit because this is basic film theory.

Yes, but we didn't need to see it again. The problem isn't with it being wrong but with it being tone-deaf. We've already confirmed twice that they raped Craster's daughter-wives, so we don't need it again, especially in a scene that played up the nudity. It was especially clunky since it came last week's scene and

She's royalty so being a pro at cock blocking would merely be demeaning. She will only answer to "most excellent dilettante of cockblocking."

Eh, at that age it's more a waking wet dream, except you're not entirely sure why, but you think it probably involves Princess Leia.

Maybe they missed the one straight up rape and some unwanted groping all marching under the banner of "fuck 'em till they die!"

I don't think he even needed Pete to commit spiritual suicide. I loved that scene where Pete is getting busy at his desk and Ted doesn't turn around, doesn't notice who is or isn't in the office and doesn't even seem to notice how dark it is. Harry also seems to be dead inside, even though we haven't seen him yet.