Just Batman. Batman's got five hundred ways to kill each member of the Justice League, three hundred and twenty-seven ways to immobilize them and seven to get them to take the grown man brooding in the spandex batsuit seriously.

No, we want to watch a movie where Superman can blow out the sun with ice breath and wears campy bright fabric and shoot rainbows out of his Krptonian behind.

Hancock was a horrible example of a superhero movie. I like Will Smith, and I liked the premise, but it was horrible.

What you did there, i see it.

Exactly what I was thinking!

The pilot isn't a bad episode. It's pacing is a little awkward, but that's what pilots are, and Eccleston is the best Doctor ever.

That said, I love Batman. But "realistic" he is not.

Right... because we all have unlimited resources and faithful butlers and a bat-mansion and a bat-cave and a bat-shark repellent and never ever get crippled despite spending years fighting crime (and even if you get your back broken like, oh, once or twice, I'm sure you'll have magic telekinetic energy to heal it)...

Oy!

Oy!

Singapore's at Number Four!

I wouldn't go with Spock; Leonard Nimoy would not use personal affectations like that. It's very unbecoming of a Vulcan.

Ah, but real world sensibilities are necessary for the audience to suspend their disbelief at a guy who fights crime dressed as a flying rodent and an alien from another planet with a giant red cape flapping behind him as he leaps tall buildings in a single bound. I do agree that these fantastical elements are what…

I was promised an explanation for the lack of red trunks.\

Cause it looks cool.

Good call.

You selected that? You're braver than I thought.

You mean 1940's Namor, not the modern sleek black onesie with an open chest he wears while palling around with the X-Men?

What "Akira"? This Neo-Manhattaned-up, whitewashed version of the original wonder ain't no Akira.

Maybe it's Pym a la Oedipal complex, taking up Barton's bow and arrows like Barton once did his Pym Particles.