If you don’t want to purchase their game, don’t. But I don’t see why you’d claim you help anyone with it. So the employees who’ve been harassed but instead of running away are trying to fix the problem now also lose their job?

I guess you’re assuming that at least the devs themselves asked for it. Not sure about that...

Exactly. And it always starts with “Tom Clancy’s”, which was the completely irrelevant part already. Now “Ghost Recon” means nothing either.

Didn’t cross my mind before this sequel but the handling of animals in FC6 (Montero vs crocodile scene, cockfighting...) raised my eyebrows because it first feels sort of out of place in it’s 21st century setting (unlike in, say, Red Dead Redemption 2) and second, the game seems to be trying so hard to be correct…

Haha, thank you sir :)

At least that reviewer admitted his own incompetence saying it’s not a review.

Right? Video games are games after all. Even if today, entertainment isn’t this medium’s only commodity, it’s still the main one, I’d say.

So, you’re not playing it, you’re just around to tell people who like the game that they are sheep, because you don’t.

I just created an account only to tell you how relived I was reading this review.