r-m-c-denziloe
Denziloe
r-m-c-denziloe

Why does it look blue?

No, zero on the y axis corresponds to the 1981-2010 average. It says this explicitly on the graph — twice.

What, posting actual data?

I’ve seen graphs that point the other direction. All very scientific.

Now fuck off.

I wish they hadn’t made those unscientific conflations in the press release video. Talking about dumping CO2 into “the air we breathe”, and even for some impenetrable reason mentioning a doubling of asthma rates!? CO2 is not harmful to health. That is not the problem. The problem is the adverse affect it has on global

I don’t get it.

Artificial meat is from natural sources too, but then it goes through a scientific process, exactly like drugs.

I understood your comment the first time. Do you honestly not understand the irony?

The world and story of the Hobbit feels very mature to me. And the prose, too. I think it’s closer to poetry and mythology than a children’s story.

Hehe, cute cliché. You refuse all of that nasty modern medicine too, do ya? Just let nature do its work? And this “natural” meat — you actually go out and kill wild animals for all of your meat, I presume? ‘Cos relying on farming technology would of course make you a hypocrite.

There is real moral ambiguity in my eyes. Yeah you’re not killing anything any more, but the animals won’t ever be born, either. All those fields full of relatively happy animals disappearing... is that so great?

Why? Where did you get that idea?

I thought “nascent technology” was a relatively simple concept to grasp, but nope!

Human! Give me sweet sweet human...

I will never understand how people who unambiguously fucked up in an embarrassing manner actually come back and attempt to continue an argument. This was the point where you’re supposed to cringe at yourself and silently fuck off.

Do you know what burgers are made out of? Haha... oh, lord.

So it does mean bucket?

As far as I can tell, the equation in the article makes no sense at all... the right hand side is not a function of x because like you say, the x there is just for summation notation.

Yeah there’s just the slight problem that this equation makes no sense. Where did you get it from..? H is a function of x on the left hand side but there is no x on the right hand side because it’s a dummy variable that just gets summed over.