qwints
qwints
qwints

There’s actually been a ban on assisting the Arab league boycott of Israel since 1979 - what that looks like in practice is that about 750 companies have paid fines for certifying to Arab countries that the stuff they were shipping wasn’t Israeli or on an Israeli ship.

Just wanted to chip in to say I think your core point was correct - the person who wrote the headline made a mistake in using the clickbait format “everyone ... except” which does erase other people’s experiences. I think if you ignore the headline, the article is actually fine, acknowledging that the experience isn’t

This is generally not true, though there are some big exceptions regarding US diplomatic and military personnel. See Morrison v. National Australia Bank, 561 U.S. 247 255 (2010)

The Charlemagne one is likely true if you’re Western European due to the math.

The danger of deferred adjudication. There’s a guy in Texas who took a deferred adjudication on a murder charge the state couldn’t prove and ended up with a life sentence for drug possession.

You can’t steal culture.

Counterpoint: representation matters.

Kids used to be beaten for speaking spanish in public school where I live. That was bad. Anglos learning spanish is not bad and takes nothing away from Chicanos.

Important and bad: Black girls being suspended.

No individual can speak for a group. Having to be the Black kid in class who is the representative of all Black people is similarly fucked up.

Has someone brought on a gender studies professor in this type of case before?

Sad coincidence - there was a verdict reached in a very similar case in Dallas today -

Too little, too late.

It’s tough to tell from the article, but it appears the plaintiff is alleging he was sexually harassed and the school didn’t investigate because of his gender. That’s a Title IX violation under current law, and it’s pretty terrible to mock someone for reporting sexual harassment.

Tripoli’s a weird second there. Didn't we lose like 50 people total in the Barbay Wars?

Exactly - they would just as soon as listed a slow and aimless walk as suspicious.

Which passage are you referring to? The one I’m familiar is 1 Cor. 11, but that only applies to women. The most likely answer is just xenophobia, with hijabs, dastaars and yarmulkes being disliked because they mark the wearer as belonging to a different culture. A smaller element may be that many Christians saw

Shockingly, it is true both that many (all?) lower end nail salons violate regulations, and that New York City targets minority owned businesses.