No individual can speak for a group. Having to be the Black kid in class who is the representative of all Black people is similarly fucked up.
qwints
qwints
Has someone brought on a gender studies professor in this type of case before?
Sad coincidence - there was a verdict reached in a very similar case in Dallas today -
Too little, too late.
It’s tough to tell from the article, but it appears the plaintiff is alleging he was sexually harassed and the school didn’t investigate because of his gender. That’s a Title IX violation under current law, and it’s pretty terrible to mock someone for reporting sexual harassment.
Tripoli’s a weird second there. Didn't we lose like 50 people total in the Barbay Wars?
Exactly - they would just as soon as listed a slow and aimless walk as suspicious.
Which passage are you referring to? The one I’m familiar is 1 Cor. 11, but that only applies to women. The most likely answer is just xenophobia, with hijabs, dastaars and yarmulkes being disliked because they mark the wearer as belonging to a different culture. A smaller element may be that many Christians saw…
Shockingly, it is true both that many (all?) lower end nail salons violate regulations, and that New York City targets minority owned businesses.
Probably. Generally an arrest warrant authorizes entry into that person’s residence if that person is inside. Here’s a blog post with a brief introduction to the law. http://crimlaw.blogspot.com/2012/03/can-of…. On the other hand, you’d want to look at Maryland law for a definitive answer.
Also, I can’t imagine the police waiting out a seven hour standoff if she didn’t have a gun.
You bet rewards from the game that can be sold on the Steam marketplace.
Hey, my ancestors stacked rocks with the best of them!
They’re actually not disagreeing that much if you read the links. The facts are pretty well established- there was a centuries old complex and stable democratic political structure that predates the US federal government I North Amrica. Franklin specifically referred to it as an example prior to the revolution, but…
The state laws are separate from (and not preempted by) federal law. If CA has jurisdiction, its law applies but nothing “reverts”.
Get back to studying - Federal Wiretap Act is one party consent.
Who actually recorded it doesn’t matter as long (at least for federal law) as long as one party to the conversation consents. Since we can assume West will say Kardashian had his permission, that should not be an issue.
All that matters is that Kim had Kanye’s consent for one party states.
he may have broken federal wiretapping law.