Wasn’t that the joke?

I interpreted the emphasis on Texas as a claim of authenticity.

I wouldn’t cite a gastropub that opened in a hip part of a big city in 2010 as the standard for “authentic” guacamole.

They do. Photographing someone who has an expectation of privacy without their consent can get you sued. Photographer’s Guide to Privacy. Privately owned venues are free to set their own rules regarding photography or require photographers to give up rights in exchange for being allowed to photograph. American Society…

I’m agreeing with you.

Sure, contractual obligations can prevent a photographer from reselling a work.

Good point. While you can’t copyright the live performance itself, the choreography is subject to copyright and photographs of the dance could infringe that copyright. Horgan v. MacMillan Inc., 789 F2d 157 (2nd Cir. 1986).

The photographer does not have the right to resell her/his images without the consent of the photo’s content

For me, it comes down to whether you were okay with what was happening as it happened.

Presumably the NAACP doesn’t do a Michling Test though.

Phillips didn’t strike out, Phillips walked. Ruiz thought it was a dropped strike 3 so he threw to first.

I don’t you can get from saying a person’s tweets aren’t nuanced to saying the person isn’t capable of nuance.

Good ad.

"whatever any couple negotiates in good faith is their business. "

If secret recording of bigotry becomes more common, we might end up with some awkward wiretapping prosecutions/lawsuits. http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/re…

Not incitement. Not even close.

I've seen emo blamed for a lot of self-harm.

Bullshit. There are plenty of people in prison based solely on the testimony of a cop or witness.

Physical evidence might matter if there was a question about whether Nungesser had sex with her. But he admits doing that. So the only question is whether she consented or not, and, in the vast majority of cases, that has to be determined solely by testimony.