can’t wait to get one of this and install windows iot, I’ll try also the full windows on ARM, unofficially ported on the pi3, but couldn’t run good enough
can’t wait to get one of this and install windows iot, I’ll try also the full windows on ARM, unofficially ported on the pi3, but couldn’t run good enough
would be fun to read the same article when will be rumors about an apple similar device, gizmodo apple fanboy bloggers, will go crazy and write how revolutionary is that
I just don’t use google, problem solved
it’s an issue really specific to calls, a bit too much to call them devil incarnate :)
Can you detail devil incarnate?
Strange, i used Teams in my previous company, now my new company use slack and it’s awful compared to Teams... Maybe you just didn’t get used to it, or you need it for small companies/projects
It’s just the usual clicbait ms hater gizmodo article, they banned only slack free for security reasons... Apple and google ban all competitors stuff instead, but no article on gizmodo of course
nope...there are just few UWP appsthat you can easily unistall with 2 clicks. UWPs are not really bloatware compared to win32 apps because they have a full clean install/uninstall, without autostart, mess up with your os settings, registry, files...
google quality and security ... ROTFL
fair enough... but strange you never complain about apple quality, you never wrote: “Am I Wrong For Wanting a non explosive $3.000 apple macbook?
LOL ... but but apple is the best
How exactly is much better? I have no problems with Slack, but if I have to choose, I found Teams much better and organized. maybe you didn’t get used to it yet... I miss Teams so much
Skype is OK... but for real teams, specially if big, collaboration you should look into Teams, once you get used to it I found much better than Skype and Slack
sayonara
Oh they’ll finally move to USA, right? /s
no thanks
not everyone use google fortunately
Glad I don’t use any google service
So you’re writing lot bad opinions, based on speculation ... I just imagine how different was the article if it was about apple