That is factually untrue. There is no law in the US that says that you are liable for what someone without explicit authorization does on your WiFi. You should still secure your wifi because you can be exposed to the expense and stress of a lawsuit or criminal prosecution depending on what it’s used for but legally,…

Oh, good, more “Freedom of speech means freedom from criticism” nonsense.

SBC would like a word.

<pedant>

your second statement is telling me to ignore the logic if your first statement.

Oh, ok! Let’s not worry about any of this because GV Goat’s wife doesn’t have issues with Uber!

“There was no equivalent of the Nuremberg trials in Japan”

About 3 light years?

Just say “about three lightyears” and it will do, surely?

The other thing is that if the market becomes flooded with low-quality, poor-performing cheap devices, then it will give the average consumer a bad impression of VR and push them away from buying good headsets once they become more affordable.

I can’t wait to find out FF is actually somehow Super Replicas.

I was hoping for something that doesn’t just generate false positives and genuinely checked for something that has vulnerabilities, not that just has ports open, and not even *what* has ports open, unless it’s a webserver.

The part of this attack (which is missed in the article) that was staggering was the bandwidth leveraged (reportedly 600-800 GBps, one party claiming responsibility bragged they have the ability to do 1 TBps+). Now that botnets are relatively cheap to rent, crippling DDoS attacks like this are really not that hard to…

Did you leave off the beginning of the quote of purpose?

People still make the “people still play this?” comment? Funny.

Your idea of “Super-Cheap” and mine are very different.

Like the iPhone 7, it lacks a headphone jack.

No sponsored disclaimer?

“Tech Savy” uses iPhone. Lol.

Click-bait articles are getting really bad.