Unless Panjabi got paid less money at Margulies insistence on their show, your comment is in no way relevant.

Why is it “unreasonable”? Serious question.

Thanks for the knowledge!

1. He’s giving them what they want or at least, think they want.

Tina Green took a 1.2 billion dollar dividend last year.

He’s trash, always been trash, always will be trash.

This whole thing sounds like a Tyler Perry production tailor made for his church-y audiences.

Maybe Bobo could lose weight, get mistaken for Julien Assange, and get summarily dragged off to Sweden?

Boris Johnson AND Donald Trump?

Monarchy and nobility in Europe went by Salic Law, which upheld male primogeniture. Everyone else went by common law, tradition or, just whatever the richest person, male or female, around with the best court connections, decided to do with their after death money.

The information is great and it’s good to see it. People getting educated on historical reality is a necessary thing in our age of disbelief.

Exactly! This is about trying to make money off the nostalgia-drunk and nothing more.  

Message received, little buddy.

Her choice then are don’t get pregnant, give the baby up for adoption, or parent the child.

I’ve argued before that some of the anti-choice movement, even most of it, really believe what they say.

That commenter thought they would come in here with their confused arguments and challenge the pro-choice libs.

Repeating you care about children dying, doesn’t make it true. As everything you write after that assertion, proves.

Tempers are frayed.

I like Beyonce a lot. But Warwick isn’t wrong.

Why does everyone forget to mention that Ashcroft was told that they could do their own orchestral version of the sample and use that, thus avoiding most of the problem but, he was fixated on using the sample and made them use it?