Under statute, it gets divided between her kids equally if there’s no legal will.

Why would she give a shit? That disabled kid likely has a trust for his care. And she’d been giving money to her kids since jump.

Drama until the very end!

I will never not be amused by the fact that in the US, her dumbass name is properly pronounced, “Ski-ana”.

https://splinternews.com/1834948508

Basic Internet Lessons I Have Learned 101:

I’m saying that, for a child that young, it isn’t out of the question and no reason to pathologize them this early.

That is the definition of a child, though.

Nothing gained. Nothing lost.

Let’s be blunt: If Uber had just been a connector of riders and drivers and taken a flat small fee, no matter what the driver charges, NONE of this stuff would have been a problem and they’d be a nice little company.

Yes, but, isn’t the point that commenter is raising is implicitly that by doing what he suggests, Uber’s problems essentially disappear and they get paid no matter what happens with the drivers?

TL;DR:

Nobody with a byline wants to fuck you. *shrug*

Julia Roberts has been the patron saint of not giving a fuck about anything not directly about Julia Roberts for a very VERY long time.

The Devil is real.

Why the hell not?

I think it’s amusing anyone thinks this is about anything but Tati feeling betrayed over Charles lying to her about not wanting to sponsor her hair vitamins.

Any video over 10 minutes is automatically monetized on Youtube.

Like, I’m a year older than her and if my life ever got to the point where I needed to pick a fight with a teenager online for attention, I’d just hang it all up and hide in a cave somewhere in shame.

And everybody got tens of millions of views to monetize.