But...that would mean you have a problem with von Trier’s alleged misogyny.
But...that would mean you have a problem with von Trier’s alleged misogyny.
Wooow.
I don’t care what you think or do at this point.
Look, I understand you’re just here to argue and enjoy the look of your own written comments. Please enjoy yourself.
Saying you’re ignorant is a description of your state of being, not a pejorative.
I really believe that the only people who give a shit anymore about these two characters, is the media.
He was a sleazy lawyer and she was a sleazy sex worker.
You couldn’t pay me to see this movie. I saw the trailer for it over the summer and, as with “Nymphomaniac”, the 70s/80s setting, costuming and, cinematography was on point. Incredible to see. But the story? Just transgression after transgression. Pure hardcore murder porn. Destined, I believe, to be one of those…
Seriously. I mean “Nymphomaniac, Pt. II” had graphic child prostitution, rape and murder.
Great story!
You telegraphed your ignorance of reality and facts.
Because her points are deeply flawed and hypocritical, given the kinds of articles her fellow editors have written on this very site.
But...that’s exactly what I was saying to the author and, implicitly, to you and other commenters in my original post.
There is zero evidence the university would have thrown her out for being gay, so no compromise there. There is zero evidence she ever faced physical violence and, obviously, given she outed herself so simply means she hasn’t felt any fear of it.
Her main and terminal point was that Alexander was covering for Stanich. Not just painting a sympathetic picture. Covering for him. As, in her narrative, men will do.
Nah.
Inasmuch as your narrative position is that in order for Alexander’s story to be complete, he had to research Stanich’s life and present it as evidence that his review and the subsequent rush of customers, didn’t hurt the business but that Stanich’s abuse and criminal behavior did, then yes, you have a point.
Who is this “left” you speak of?
The whole point is to make it more “domestic and insular”.
There’s a book on Epstein that goes into nauseating detail about the crimes (from the victims own sworn statements) and how the local cops and officials, right on up to the governor’s office, helped him continue luring and abusing young girls for years. I happen to have read it a couple of months ago.