quirkyquokka
T L
quirkyquokka

As a Clinton voter who would have happily voted for Bernie, I can say that whoever runs with a D next to their name gets my vote.  I’m not picky.  I just want a non-traitor as president.  Is that too much to ask?

not sure how Obama ‘fooled’ anyone, the inflation rate during his presidency hovered between 0% and 3%.  cut unemployment in half, and while GDP growth was slow the economy was sound when he left office - especially when you consider the economic crisis he inherited from the Bush administration.

It’s largely in the tone and emphasis, but more importantly it’s in who they’re beholden to. Any Democratic candidate (at least at the Presidential level) is going to be far more beholden to at least giving some due to Democratic constituencies than this rich asshole ever will. He even made that abundantly clear, in

Serious question were you hit in the head recently? Do you have mental illness or just a low IQ? Bernie voters would never vote a billionaire who thinks rich people already pay too much in taxes.   

You might have a point, if the choice was Hillary or Bernie, or Bernie or this assclown.

Do you really need polls to understand basic frameworks? All you said was that you haven’t seen anyone that supports Schultz. Well, they’re out there. And they are called boomers who hate Bernie.

He’s popular with baby boomers who hate Bernie.

Click-bait. I haven’t seen a single Democrat that said they’d vote for this cock knocker. If anything, his libertarian views would peel off more Trump voters than Democrat (He’d definitely claim the 12% of Bernie voters that thought voting for Twitler was just fine).

$40 million would pay for a lot of school lunches for kids that can’t afford them and get the cheese sandwich shaming.

Agreed. With $40mil he could build a massive compound just south of the border to keep asylum seekers safe while waiting for the process to unfold. Or feed millions in Yemen. Or something.

And then the AP will fact check his lie and decide it takes two to lie: one to lie and one to listen.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump denies that Chuck & Nancy even had a televised rebuttal when he finds out his speech had lower ratings. 

I read and folded the laundry.

Oh, good job!  Those of us who have never been polled appreciate you contribution.

The resemblance is uncanny

Shit, he’s capable of going all the way and telling us he’s never cared about ratings anyway.

“Actually I won the ratings BIG once you subtract all the ILLEGAL ALIENS who tuned in to support Nancy Pelosi who wants OPEN BORDERS!!”

Goddamn, that one wet streak of gel he has on each temple makes me want to vomit every time I see it.

LOL. I was in bed, reading.  Fuck that guy (also, I actually have a Nielsen box, so glad I could contribute!). 

He’s either going to lie and say his ratings were higher, or just not bring it up. It really could go either way.