“To be with another woman, that is French. To be caught, that is American."

uuuuuughhh

I’m sure there is room for improvement in my post. You are too kind. But, thank you! United we stand! Together we fight!

Our Constitution is very strong. But, compliance with and to it has largely been based on the allegiance of honorable public servants, kept in compliance by their colleagues on the hill and their fear of public scrutiny and rejection. We now realize the need to codify and legislate allegiance to the Constitution to…

You are very kind. Thank you. Totally agree. :)

He was on the board of directors for a company while being a sitting congressman? How the fuck is that a thing?

He was on the board of directors for a company while being a sitting congressman? How the fuck is that a thing?

How is this the first I’ve seen this comparison? Magnificent.

Wrong. He was on the board of the company. It’s an Australian company. BOD members for publicly traded companies owe fidelity to the stockholders. The CEO alerted him so they could prepare for a public statement announcing the trial failure. That’s WHY Collins set off a chain reaction of family members’ to sell instead…

Really? Let’s have a look at their trades too. There are plenty of sweaty brows in congress and the west wing right now. HELLOOOO! YOUUUU HOO!

Seriously, that statement makes the lawyers sound so stupid.

Local callers to WBEN, the Buffalo area radio station that is run by a Tea Party activist, are confidently informing the public that this is all to cover up secret payments over the Steele Document.

I think it is just great that you think just because it isn’t applicable that will stop idiots from using it to defend him.

It is notable that even the government does not allege that Congressman Collins traded a single share of Innate Therapeutics stock

So, to take the verbiage of the survey, specifically, then....whoever gets to define “bad behavior” would control the media at that point.

You’re ignoring the simple fact that Trump has made it more than clear that he thinks “criticising Donald Trump” falls under the definition of “engaging in bad behaviour”.

LOL. Fitting

Yeah, but they were seen as kooks, correct? A fringe.

I suspect the numbers have shifted a bit in recent years, but at least as far back as the 1960s there has always been a segment of the American public that believed this. I can recall reading John Birch Society literature during the early 1980s that openly asked why leftist media figures were not arrested for treason. 

Just to be clear, these ignorant assholes were always around, just afraid to spew their ignorance so boldly in public, right? I mean, this level of stupidity isn’t a new development?