True, smart phones do perform magic—a disappearing act on your cash.

I'll second that motion.

Same in Portland, OR.

Iconic could be referring to that, though I suppose only Jesus knows for sure.

True, but icons are also usually widely known. I suppose this building is widely known in architectural circles, but not the US as a whole. If it's one of the "most iconic buildings in the US", that seems to imply, at least to me, that it's iconic of the US. Most people would probably not agree that this is…

Same here. I'd say the fireflies ruined what was going to be a nice photo.

Awesome comment. Thanks. =)

Iconic? I never heard of this building.

Not safe fur work?

Why so serious?

That's great, until some soldier arrests you for taking a daguerreotype . "Hey, I can't leave. This thing takes hours to get an exposure!"

Considering some of the other projects in the study were "the linux kernal" and "webkit", I'd say that a project can be quite successful and popular while being very 'open'. The linux kernal is used in tons of OSes and other software projects, including Android itself, and webkit is used in Safari, iPhone and iPad…

Casey didn't write the study he's writing about, however, regardless of any bias he may or may not have.

It's not the size that matters, but where you get to fly it. In the case of the shuttle now, that's nowhere.

No apps. That's why all mobile technology fails.

I called them both names when I was young.

I know it's not a dslr, but its picture quality is nearly equivalent. At least that's what dpreview said.

Yea, I knew that too since I read it on another site.

All the reviews I've read say the NEX-5's picture quality is about as good as some of the Canon and other dslrs.

I'm glad I lost that bid on ebay for a NEX-5. I figured there were some refreshes inbound, since the NEX-3 just got one.