"Everyone who's ever gone through a yellow light, like a normal person, only for it to turn red just as you exit the intersection and then you see a giant flash pop up so you instinctively slam on the brakes in the desperate hope that you won't get a ticket"

yellows are 3 seconds minimum per federal law

That looks beyond dated, holy crap. The S class of the same era looks much better.

it makes no sense to me either. I've been a cop for 9 years and have never done that just to do it. I get paid hourly....I'll sit at a light for as long as you wanted me to.

So this is a confirmed report of an assault or are we just lighting torches and grabbing pitchforks based on an allegation with no evidence?

We had a Skoda when we lived in what is now former Yugoslavia. I was young, but I do remember the thing over heating A LOT.

It is made is Serbia by my people. Not surprising it's unreliable. If it was an AK it would be amazing though.

I had a tire balance issue with mine that was a defect in the tire and more of a Michellin problem. So far so good with thr diesel.

Abuse of power would mean operating outside of the law. The law in fact provides for officers to go at certain speeds to enforce speeding violations. You using the word incorrectly changes the meaning of your whole statement.

Please look up the definition of entrapment and then rewrite your idiotic, and now nullified comment.

You literally know nothing about the law and how it applies in this case.

It's Kvyat not Kyvat.

Most don't? Explain why most people who own cars like that don't deserve them.

In a grand jury, things that are debatable are not allowed. Also, witnesses and experts can also testify during grand jury hearings. I'm sure evidence the public was not aware of came out during the hearing.

Definitely doesn't look good. Top of the roll bar was completely crushed in. Hope the kid makes it.

This guy is a comedian? That wasn't even funny.

Both sides would have expert witnesses, criminologists, and lab tech testifying about what is required for someone to be impaired. It's not up to one guy. Go sit through a trial, it will give you some insight.

You're saying that a DA who deals with cases where someone drives high or under the influence of something and kills a person while doing so doesn't know what metabolites to look for or what levels of active substances to look for? Because that's what I'm getting from your post

great rant but AA is not on terminal 2.

If this comes to the US, sign me up please.