Yes, this is true, but the problem seems to be in the overall interior design, and not in drivetrain routing. I don’t know for sure, but from sitting in both that’s the way it looks to me.

Strange take. Fieros have very spacious interiors for their size, and the plastic is painted just like any other plastic on any other car.

Ah—gotta have that context when mentioning on a site like jalopnik that you kicked someone else’s car.

Geez, dude. That car sounds hideous, but you sound like a douche. You kicked someone else’s car? Not cool, man. I hate stanced cars, but I’m not going to kick someone’s rolled fender because of it.

The thing about Tauruses is that they’re friggin huge, but mysteriously have cramped interiors. And they’re just plain not as good looking as the Fusion.

Counter-argument:

Muhahahahahahaha!

I’ll never understand the anti-Fiero crowd.

I’m jelly. Mine is a crystal red cts wagon, but “just” a premium :(

I hope you can see this, because I’m doing it as hard as I can.

And when they inevitably move on, I will be there. Watching. Waiting.

You missed a better opportunity:

Had a 98 contour sport with the v6 and manual. Really fun car, and only a tick slower than the svt

Expected another lame condom joke, but was pleasantly surprised. Kudos

Iowa. Many of them have rusty rocker panels, but are still running strong.

The contour was (and is) a great car. I still see tons of them on the road.

The headlights on the E60 just ruin it. Everything else I actually like.

Huh, my parents’ Oldsmobile station wagon had a similar feature. It was activated by stopping the car and shoving my brother and me out to walk.

I used to see tons of Monteros, though, and I still see Outlanders. It seems like they just started making all of their cars crappier in general.

Clarence Beeks?