It's like an elderly person picking up an ipad or a sports car. They got nice stuff but it would really be better in someone else's hands
It's like an elderly person picking up an ipad or a sports car. They got nice stuff but it would really be better in someone else's hands
No, not the creating. Not at all..... Publishing and creating are two totally different things. I doubt SquareEnix themselves has to skills to make a game with the quality of Deus Ex and Arkham Asylum, they did make a good choice in distributing it but that's all. Because by your logic, SquareEnix creates the Call of…
Don't forget bullshit gameplay as of late
It looks nice, but what will they do with it? I hope they let Eidos play around with the engine
Was talking about health care vs weapons. If I had to trade one for the other, though having both would be nice
needs +100 pounds.
CATS
Oh trust me, we all want that. But when rich old white men run the country, the real interests of the country aren't represented
How about we blame bad parenting? The guy wanted to kill his own mother and actually did it
You know, there has been an increase in Omni-tool deaths lately
I don't know how long they were in the studio for Max Payne 3. But HEALTH is godawful live. I saw them get booed off stage in October
If they did their job right there would be no need for FF13-2 and a FF14 'lets try it again'. FF13-2 was better than 13 but not a good game compared to the competition (Mass Effect, Bethesda, Witcher 2).
I haven't been let down by any of the 2d Rayman games. It was Ubisoft trying to make him go all 3d platforming during the ps2 and xbox era that gave him a bad name.
I think there is a price (around $40,000?) to put something on XBLA. Knowing Capcom, I highly doubt they would foot that bill if there is no money to be made even if it gives them exposure.
They have future plans to make a device to compete with consoles, which is going to cost a lot in development and testing. For them, console gaming is a new market and Steam isn't a household brand compared to Xbox, Sony, and Nintendo. So it does make sense for them to make more money and fund that project.
You have a point. I guess I was just looking forward to it making a splash
I just remember a previous article where a topic was brought up about stagnation and all the big titles being sequels and spinoffs. The answer from a dev was 'not in this cycle' and new franchises would be established when a new console is released. I can't remember the exact title of the article though but it was…
Well, I'm not sure of the statements in the article were take out of context but it just seemed like some of the guys interviewed never even bothered to take a look at it. I do believe that there will be ports like you say but by then I'll probably be playing the newest game on the PC/PS3/360
You're right, most of the time when I have guest over we only play 1st party Nintendo games on the Wii and everything else on the 360.
Yea I'd like to see Capcom and Ubisoft release a PC game on the same date (or even keep patches updated) as consoles from the getgo. I guess lack of support was poor choice of wording on my part, but PC is treated like a second class citizen to some devs