Lived with a stripper whose nom de pole was “Lily” which was actually pretty classy compared to all the Rubies and Alexxises and Lunas and Sinndies.

I’m not familiar with the movie, but seems like she played a supporting role and was not just some extra since she mentions having her own trailer and is listed in the cast for it.

This, admittedly, is not completely fair, but every time I hear one of these after-the-fact stories, I can’t help but think “how brave of this person to sit on the story right up until that celebrity becomes radioactive enough that I can share it with no risk.”

Come on Depp apologists, come on and make your comments. You’re totally not just misogynists, you’re fighting for a valiant cause, like a knight in the crusades or a WW2 fighter pilot.

I really want to see a critical deep dive on this show and how it fits into the Christian media from a non-evangelical perspective. Like, it seems to be the most popular piece of Christian media, but nobody outside of Christians are interested in talking about it, they all focus on the God’s Not Dead freak shows. The…

I’m tired of pretending to humor Christians while they spread their message of hate and intolerance. 

If you believe it’s a true story: The Greatest Story Ever Told

The “boop/beep” thing was a direct insult to Pedro Pascal, after he put pronouns in his bio as a show of support for his trans sister. Publicly attacking the star of the hugely successful show you somehow landed a part on is exactly the kind of stupid-as-shit career move that leads directly to working for Ben Shapiro.

well he bought a website promoted as absolute free speech, offered to be interview by a guy with no limits on conversation topics, then fired him.

You never heard about anyone getting molested or harassed on You Can’t Do That On Television.  Gen-X wins again!

Yeah, he did some bad shit.  

Racist?  What?  Commenting or disapproving of another culture isn't racist.  If that were the case, modern society wouldn't have improved over millenia.  Come on. 

I thought DiCaprio was mind-bogglingly wrong for this movie, and I tend to really like his work.

I was genuinely surprised that Gladstone didn’t win, but I saw both movies and if I’m honest with myself, it’s almost not even fair for them to compete in the same category. Emma Stone is in almost every single scene, and did such a phenomenal job. She absolutely earned her win, and it’s only because of “optics” that…

Every time I see people with this same bullshit take, I think that you either didn’t see Poor Things or you don’t understand how basic math works.

Oh fuck all the way off twice. Emma Stone did nothing wrong.

Scorsese’s epic was undoubtedly one of the best films of the year.

I saw both Poor Things and KOFM. Emma Stone is much more front and center in her movie and her performance is very showy. Lily Gladstone’s performance is much quieter and for me impactful. However, it isn’t hard to see why Stone took home the Oscar. Nobody got robbed of anything.

“Robbing” is a strong and inappropriate word. It would have been awesome to see Gladstone win because I really loved her performance, but Stone’s was also really incredible, and a much bigger part of her film. The award was up for grabs especially between the two of them, and not for Gladstone to lose.

Do you mean this headline: Shōgun recap: The epic turns up the action in “Tomorrow Is Tomorrow”?