Apparently, glam was still hanging on at this time. And my how things have changed since then. *heheh*

Today's images of the future city are so bleak compared to those of the early-to-mid 20th century. It seems that hope is lost for a better tomorrow. It must have been exciting to live in world that imagined a future like the one below - today's depictions of tomorrow leave very little to look forward to.

I was unaware of this lunar occurrence. But I swear I experienced a few of the items mentioned by John Rennie *grinz*.

You did well in your discussion of the 'historical' Jesus - and you have great patience. I gave up trying to explain, and point out, the flaws in the storyline as it almost always just ends with folks believing what they started with in the first place. People will cling to their 'dear beliefs' (Jung's term) with…

I was pondering the use of Jesus on the ossuary. Does it actually say Jesus, or does it say, Joshua? If the inscription is written in Hebrew - or 'Jewish' script - it should read Joshua. Not Jesus, as that is the Greek variation. Even if it was written in Aramaic, which was the popular language of the time, it should…

Yes bob_d - you got that right.

Yes. I read Holy Blood, Holy Grail a few years before Dan Brown's plagerism and was infuriated to see how much attention his novel received as compared to Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln's work. And they really had to work. All Brown had to do was insert names here and there.

That's amusing.