But they'd still be possibly discoverable. This sentence in the Chronicle article sort of misses the point: "Medical privacy typically can be breached in a lawsuit setting only when a patient sues a health-care provider for malpractice." It's true that suing your doctor for med mal. gives them a waiver to release…

Oh my god.

My knee-jerk reaction was to be pissed off as well. It definitely feels like an invasion of privacy, but if you click over to the blog and read it, I think you'll change your mind. Or at least feel a little less betrayed.

How about you read the linked blog entry first, god damn it?

Honestly, wouldn't mind getting called "Dickface Penispoop" in real life if it meant free cable and internet for like 4 years

Only because of the nets.

I only care about who serve Dr. Pepper, not that horrible wannabe called "Pibb"

And you are a fool. In a perfect world, all services would be 100% secure, and impervious to attack, but we all know that will never happen, no matter how much money you throw at the problem. Besides, this attack has nothing at all to do with security, so I'm not sure what your point is.

I don't believe in killing a large group of brainwashed people because of one asshole.

Did you say INTERVIEW? (I'll show myself out)

Yeah, I imagine they will need to air drop dvd players too. And televisions. And electricity.

It's a short sequence of glyphs I use to identify myself, but that's not important right now.

Does Detroit have an alpine hill? Maybe you could bulldoze all the vacant buildings into a huge pile.

So if one person is against my beliefs, I should ban them? What would happen if a site blocked someone because he or she is homosexual? Is there any difference? Sometimes I feel as if some people are preaching equality, but they want supremacy...