Semantics are important in any field of science.

It's okay. I apologize as well for sounding judgmental. It comes along with the degree and the subsequent assigned readings of Richard Dawkins.

No problem, the Internet is bad for debating-slash-reasoning.

Yes, there are genetic commonalities by ethnicity, but that's not the same as saying a white woman and a black women are biologically different.

Then we agree on something.

There's this thing called adaptation. It has nothing to do with race, but with a combination of luck, genetics from parents, and location.

I'm not ignoring it. Genetics have nothing to do with race, populations do — but I'm not for one minute going to call that race because race is socially constructed and ill-advised to ever bring up in terms of medical treatment.

Obviously not, considering the fact that you think that your argument is proof that different races have different biological workings.

Nobody is challenging the fact that there are some diseases that are prevalent in one group — people are challenging the fact that it's because of race when it is not.

Correlation doesn't equal causation.

What happens if you're half-black? Is the vaccine strong enough to counteract my 50% blackness or are my white genes somehow more dominant when it comes to my vagina?