Or hey maybe people aren’t feeling sympathetic towards her because sh just lost in shiny pebbles what poor countries don’t have in food. But please dear god WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE RICH PEOPLE

Fairness to you though Sanders absolutely dropped the ball on trying to unite his base and that’s totally on him

Nothing trollish about it. Clinton’s was a party division whereas in Sanders case it’s democrats complaining independent voters didn’t switch to them. But keep on acting high and mighty you intrepid hypocrit

There’s always been the party difference between Clinton and Sanders. In 08 it was party democrats that needed to be pulled in line. In 2016 it was independents and previously uninterested voters that really helped bolster Sanders’ numbers. Obviously it’s gonna be different to try to get people to follow a party line…

Yeah but the Clinton hold outs were party democrats, the Bernie bro Stein/Johnson converts are either independents or people who wouldn’t have voted to begin with. That’s why it’s always been a mistake to assume Sanders’ supporters would all eventually follow a party line; it’s not their party

Hey now, she could totally pass as a Chernobyl 40

Good to see Clinton supporters tearing down a 70 year old successful woman for using a tactic they themselves used in 08. Stay classy party politics

Kinda like those Clinton supporters threatened to do in 08? How quick y’all are to turn on tactics you made popular

You’ve never had the option of anonymity in the internet era

Ah yes, who can forget how examining events in someone’s life interacts with their life so unfairly favors white men. No woman or person of color has ever had an impactful event influence their work. Never happens.

I’m a medical user and I’ve been in treatment for both coke and alcohol. Just because it’s pot doesn’t mean it can’t be a negative influence in someone’s life. I’m not saying it is in Pitts case, but you seem pretty positive he’s not just bc it’s pot. Which is a bit of a simplistic approach to how addiction works

A Jez post featuring Sam Bee that doesn’t have a seaf “she should have hosted the daily show” comments???

Well to be fair addiction can be non physical(meaning no withdrawals) and it’s worth mentioning there’s no set requirement. There’s no you have to have blank blank and blank to be an addict. Pretty much the only person who can decide he has a problem is him and those that are involved in his life

If he had a serious marijuana problem his piss test would not be clean as it’s been reported here. If you regularly smoke thc stays in your system for a very long time(like around a month).

I think the argument needs to be made that the humor of those sketches are rooted in haha Fred in a dress bc honestly it doesn’t seem so to me. The humor of hose sketches p frequently revolve around how incompetent ofbusiness owners they are. And as another commenter mentioned it’s weird that they only found the…

Or maybe, just maybe, they put him in a dress bc the shop owners are main characters and women. And of the two of them only one is a woman, so sacrifices had to be made. Seriously, at no point do they draw attention to the fact that the character is being played by a man, let alone ridicule the fact.

“Ugh I can already see people blaming one half of this couple for no reason” - person blaming other half of this couple for no reason

If the skittles analogy is fine for men bc men are more likely to rape then you’ve just played doubly into the “all immigrants are rapists” party. Seriously, in most of Europe that’s almost a bigger refugee “threat” than terrorism is. This doesn’t seem to be a situation where you can pick or choose when it’s okay,…

As someone born and raised in Los Angeles way to forget us, shitlord

Is the average shell shocked and grieving reaction to try and profit from tragedy? The company came to a settlement with the people they were absolutely not responsible for harming and yet it still wasn’t good enough for some of them. In what way is it shitty for them to recoup their loses?