Yeah... because you aren’t actively playing the game.

I refuse to believe that anyone cares as much about this movie as people are trying to *convince* me that people care so much about this movie.

Lets be clear about it, this is one of those “feature, not a bug” situations.

I don’t think he was ‘making demands’. He said ‘This is how I do my voice. If this is good for you, then cool.’ Blame the producers, if anyone. Seth was just upfront about how is performance would be and they still hired him despite that warning.

Please note this post is an adaptation of this much cleaner tweet:

No.

I’m not criticizing the substance of your article in anyway, I’m just making an editing suggestion. You write “... Ewing claims ... Maya Higa, allegedly responded to his apology and request to work together.” The word allegedly is generally defined as referring to claims of illegality or other bad behaviors. We can…

Do you truly believe that no human being is capable of reform? Is turning over a new leaf an incomprehensible concept to you? Have a little more faith in humanity.

Wow, this is a great example of how you actually apologize and repair the damage you’ve done!

Jesus Christ. It’s absolutely standard for bank failures to sell the bank’s assets in an attempt to make the depositors whole, because it’s absolutely vital for the functioning of the economy for people to be able to trust that they can put their money in banks. That’s part of the whole FDIC process: the Fed provides…

Wow, this is just an uninformed take. The banking part is being helped, which is the part where people gave them money and said, “hey, keep this money safe for me so I have it available for my financial responsibilities, like payroll.”

Yeah, this topic has way too much nuance for Kotaku to cover, at all. But using flimsy pretexts to write articles about the hottest topic on twitter is pretty much the job description at gawker. At least, when there’s not actually relevant news making headlines.

You should probably add that the FDIC has said that the cost of this bailout will be paid for the banking sector as a whole through a special assessment (i.e. higher FDIC insurance costs), not by the taxpayers. That makes it different from the 2008 bailouts.

Says the website with a fake Japanese name.

Isn’t it sort of...i dunno, *implied* that anything from 2006 is going to be “of it’s time?” I’m not excusing the content of what’s said but like, gaming in the early 00' ain’t exactly the most inclusive hobby.

You cared enough to click on the article AND leave comment. You have to admit that you give at least a small fraction of a fuck. Otherwise you just would have ignored the article and gone about your day.

(Fades in and out of each line)

FOILED BY INTERPRETATION AND OPINIONS ONCE AGAIN

You’d have hoped wrong, sir.

I was right there with you up until this: