poopbutt420
poopbutt420
poopbutt420

The director’s goal is not just to depict a scene of violence, but also to make sure that the performer is emotionally safe.

I’m shocked, SHOCKED that a guy whose brand is a proudly irredeemable asshole who cranks out films full of violence and misogyny has been revealed to be a five-star jerk.

Why is he so familiar with what authentic strangulation looks like?

I’d say he has far more than a foot fetish - he likely has all of those scenes where he inserted himself in place of the actor queued up next to Jawbreaker. It’s disturbing that reports suggest he only does it for violence against women - is he ever attacking the men during filming, or sitting down for a coffee scene

Y’ALL:

A few of his ex-girlfriends have said his foot fetish is so extreme it has basically emotionally stunted him (which is why literally the first thing he said to Rose McGowan was how sexy her feet are).

Really surprised that an “exploitation” film director is a piece of shit. Sadism has always been a theme in his films. I wonder why.

God what a piece of shit. I don’t think I can ever watch one of his movies again. He just comes off as such a creep.

Cars go on bridges, therefore relevant.

Intolerance =/= thinking someone’s a fucking moron.

I’m actually a big fan of being bigoted towards racists and sexists.

Your opinion is stupid. I tolerate it, but I it’s very, very stupid.

Dunno who ungreyed this clown, but we’re all worse off for it.

A Democrat before the parties switched places and the civil rights movement caused racists to flee to the Republican party.

Good. Fuck off. No one wants to see monuments to racists and traitors anyhow.

That’s a worst-case scenario.

So? Still a good thing to do.

Thin Mint bridge, dude! Thin Mints. Yah racist! =P

What do they want to name it- The Do-Si-Do Bridge?