I’ve only had one bernout reply—the advantage of splinter going kaput.

I saw that, too. It’s fucking offensive.

They’re both right. HRC is more correct than Chelsea, but the faux-politeness some of those Brits use to talk down the Duchess of Sussex comes from her background as a working woman and a divorcee. Meaning, she’s not that upper crust type. And why isn’t she that upper crust type? Because she’s black, of course, but…

I think it’s simpler than that: his male ego. He called HRC “unqualified” when all he has done is rename a few post offices? He hires sycophants who feed off that ego (Sirota, Gray, the dude who lasted a day) and project that onto his followers. It’s a cult of personality. Note all that “daddy bernie” shit and how…

The virus-y ads existed way before our new corporate overlords. That’s a kinja feature and not a bug.

For a guy whose supporters/surrogates/staff love to point out that he marched with MLK, this is a major lapse in judgment and shows a real lack of care. However, I’m not surprised given his other hires.

The Sanders campaign hired a guy who made his own viral campaign video to be their new video person. And then twitter vetted him before Sanders’ campaign did...

Never have I felt so seen by a tweet

Now that would be something. I wonder where the country would be in about 20 or so years if someone like Danica Roem could be in position to run for president. And I only say 20 or so years because I imagine she’d have to build her résumé first. That’s one of my gripes about Buttigieg.

We all have different things that inform our choices. For me, it’s seeing a black woman as president in my lifetime. I don’t feel like that’s an issue I can settle on with Harris in the running, but if I had my way, HRC would be president right now.

Again, she has this to say:

She includes medically necessary treatments for trans people in her LGBTQ+ platform.

I’m not sure what people want from her that’s short of self-flagellation. She said she takes “full responsibility.” You want her to own it more than that? I can’t help you there.

Zero assumptions. I don’t think anyone is giving Harris any benefits of their doubts. She’s being fully vetted, more than most. I also don’t think I gave you any more “chide” than you gave me.

You’re welcome!

You would have never given her the benefit of the doubt. And I’m pretty sure she has addressed her AG record, numerous times.

No clue about who gets to ask questions, but it seems like CNN dropped the ball all around with regards to black trans representation.

I doubt Warren would’ve dragged him for it either. Why not let Harris have her moment?

Support this man!

Yup.