Yes you are, but you’re definitely justified in that. Although I would say this was a decision by the local plant manager​ aka a decent human and not the corporation. Go ahead and have some feels.

They’re a multinational oil company used to tons bad press and being the bad guy. I’m guessing they could have very easily said “fuck it”. Instead, they chose otherwise. And yes, this does net them goodwill. Doing a good thing even when it’s in your benefit is still a good thing.

I love Mark Hamill. He just comes across as such a genuinely good dude.

D.B. Pooper

Because as everyone knows, once something goes out on the internet it’s gone forever if you get a reporter to delete a tweet.

Whose stomach is so weak that they can’t look at a couple of tiny blisters?

I’m sorry, but in what world are these photos graphic? Also, the blistered finger? This is why people say we’ve gone too far in nannying everyone.

Correction: everybody behind has to slow down because of whomever it is behind this guy that overreacts and brakes when they don’t need to. A gap is a gap, and people who use all of the available road - as in a proper zipper merge - help the greater good by maintaining the flow and keeping these backups short.

The guy…

I’d like a source for your stats of deaths caused by US foreign policy since WWII. Not because I question your honesty, or doubt that it’s possible, I’d just like some evidence that it is. I do have a problem with your assertion that Europe didn’t have an issue with the Muslim world before the US ratcheted up its…

How’s this even remotely related to hoopties ?

This take makes sense only if you think Malkin’s hit was clean. Considering Malkin left his feet to make contact with a player’s head, a player that didn’t even play the puck, is the very definition of a dirty hit.

we had a lot of discussion about this headline, and still were discussing when it went live—we’ve changed it for the same concerns you express here.

Someone JUST WROTE a great article on what constitutes a bad headline, one that does no service to the article and one that I defended because people use the term click-bait when it doesn’t apply.

I don’t get soccer but how was the winner not offsides? Is it not just “you can’t be closer to the goalie than any defender?”

From the WD-40 website -

Yes, otherwise they are not poor.

You shouldn’t be making large purchases if you can’t afford healthcare. Common sense should never go away.

Why should I help you pay for something you could afford yourself if you had any self control?

Personal responsibility should not be shunned and he is not all that wrong. It may not be a popular statement, and it may hurt peoples feelings or offend them... but spend money responsibly. I have a buddy that used a go phone for YEARS because that is all he could afford. When he finally got some pay raises and his…

Absolutely... If you’re poor, but have an iPhone, a PS4, and a big screen HDTV then I’m not paying for your healthcare.