plzprettypuss2
plzprettypuss2
plzprettypuss2

Dear Humanity,

I'm always not quite sure how to feel about that statement. Certainly, autism has been cast as the boogeyman of the anti-vaccine movement. Most people with autism can function and do okay.

I agree on that. This case should have been tossed on standing issues. You'll get no argument from me there.

I believe statistically speaking, religiosity is linked to less inclination to use drugs. But here's the thing - so is atheism. The highest levels of drug use, it seems, are among those who identify as "spiritual but not religious."

But most of those groups you cite had one major difference - they actually 1.) had plaintiffs that incur harm and 2.) they actually wanted to make things BETTER for people.

No, that is what they tell you.

I am Pink! I'm a proud distributionist - not a capitalist, not a communist. I don't favor investing huge powers with the state like Communists do, but I sure do favor the ability to distribute wealth in an equal and humane way. And seems like now, believing that makes you evil. (Never mind that Distributionism was

Okay, here's my take - this is wrong. My grandfather passed under somewhat similar circumstances (on a ventilator that was turned off). My father was driven to it because he noticed that his father continued to show reactions to stimuli. When he asked if it was possible that his father was still in pain, the doctor

My argument is simply that now, we've reached the point where you have wealth that you will never be able to spend. An economist actually crunched the numbers and figured out that for many of the super-rich living today, it would take approximately 300 years for the family to actually SPEND the wealth they have now

Isn't this just more and more evidence that we need get billionaires (and millionaires too, why not) out of the political process? They set up these think tanks that basically troll for people whose stories can be twisted into whatever suits the purpose. I love how one of the plaintiffs isn't even aware of HOW she

It's hard to tell, because I don't think she's ever explained it. Best I can tell, she buys into the stuff propagated by militant black groups like the Nation of Islam and others, who basically believe that white Jews have exploited and profited off the labor and suffering of black people. She's said stuff before

Can this serve as final notice that Azealia Banks is not a decent person in any sense of the word? I don't care if she is on point when it comes to talking about racism (and I say this as a POC). I don't care if she's on the right side of the anti-Iggy debate. She is homophobic (and anti-Semitic, let's add that too)

I remember learning that Joni Mitchell was, in her youth, extremely athletic and had very little interest in music. She said that polio dramatically altered her ability to be competitive and took a lot of her athletic dreams away, so she turned to music and art as a way to compensate, and that was when she realized

Remember that conversation Will Smith had in Hitch?

Most of the hate directed at her and Let's Move is just right-wing "creeping socialism" fears and yes, it is BS.

Yes, because re-enacting one of the largest war crimes ever on American soil is TOTALLY the way to respond to one crazy judge, hehe!

Just so all y'all know, you really, really should take a look at Roy Moore's Wikipedia page sometime (and Google too). Give yourself a few minutes of uninterrupted time and just read the greatest hits of the man himself. Some tidbits:

Eh, I'm not a fan of "But X is a bigger problem!"

Well, um, that crab looks awfully alive up there...

But here's the thing: familial relations are sort of set in stone and you can't really control where they go. If your brother just so happened to enroll in the university where you teach, well, you don't have much say in that situation. Romantic relationships are different in that you fundamentally have a choice in