Mirena CAN stop your period, but it's not guaranteed. My doctor said they normally do make your periods much lighter.

Since we still define sex as PIV, I'd presume that this counts 1.) virgins and 2.) lesbian women and bi women who are currently involved with women. It's bad definitions. They're not have reproductive sex, let's say that.

I just love the fact that each month now I get to flounce past the feminine hygiene aisle of the drug store and feel superior because I have not had to make a purchase in the past 2 years. Yay!

Sadly, I think you're wishing for an impossibility. Short of an actual video of the crime, rape is unique among crime in that it is almost totally impossible to prove (and even with video, you'd still get skeptics). It is among the few crimes that rarely will ever had any third party witnesses; it is among the few…

Eh. There's healthy skepticism and unhealthy skepticism. Healthy skepticism here would have actually helped Jackie because it would have probably led to the reporter not choosing to use her as the hallmark of the story.

So basically now, it feels like we're getting into the space where things are getting into "who's lying" territory. If Randall is being honest and Rolling Stone never, ever sought to contact him, and the reporter is being truthful that she actually did send and email and get a response, what are the possible…

But I think the question is whether it could be considered defamatory given the context. Presumably, Cosby hired his attorney (who is the only one recently who's been commenting) to defend him from these accusations. It would stand to reason that an attorney's best defense to such allegations would be to say, "the…

Defamation is a tricky thing in the best of cases. My concern here is that she seems to be referring not to statements made by Cosby himself (since I cannot find anything online that contains a direct quote from Cosby calling her a liar) but by statements made by Cosby's lawyers, spokespeople, etc. TMZ doesn't have an…

Oh honey. Good luck, you're gonna need it.

Needs more pie, ya know ;)

Please then, ruminate some more upon the term "cite" which according to the dictionary, means:

I cited an article in Forbes that pops up with a few quick seconds of Googling. You on the hand have cited your guts. Frankly, I still think I win on that one. You must ruminate some more!

Actually, she didn't. When investigated further, the guy Breitbart found did not match the physical description of Barry Dunham provided, and both he and Dunham say they never met each other. Breitbart had to search high and low to find somebody who even marginally fit the description Dunham provided. You are making…

I think Breitbart saw himself as an Upton Sinclair-type muckracker who was a return to the journalism of the early 20th century who was going to "uncover" things that the larger media could or would not do. Which I guess at some point may have been...admirable? I mean, I can see the point of muckrakers, they do serve…

You know what? I actually feel bad for everyone involved. It sounds like Lena was NOT intentionally trying to ID anybody as her attacker, but inadvertently picked a combo of details that, unfortunately, did implicate what is likely an innocent person. The real problem is that Breibart decided that this is evidence of…

Do you dispute the actual article I cited? And might I remind you, you've produced absolutely noting beyond a pitiful "from what I can tell." Sooo...you're still trailing behind, honey. Ruminate some more, it helps!

Inability to take one's own advice is never a good thing, ya know.

Have some pie. Ruminate. ;)

Well, the Forbes article was written by an actual financial statistician who might, what's the term, know his shit. You on the other hand seem to have produced nothing to assert your own claims. So forgive me if you're not being taken seriously.

But isn't that statistically simplistic? Wouldn't you have to differentiate between "windfall" winners and those who win far more modest sums? If you read much of the articles out there, the windfall winners are in statistically far worse positions than those who win modestly. It seems like your argument doesn't…