plaidcladjester2
Pope Somhairle, Bishop of Evans, Pine, Hemsworth, Anti-Pratt
plaidcladjester2

No, but we so by it’s development and at six weeks it is not a baby, a child, etc. It is a fetus. Pretty simple and straightforward if you're an honest person not trying to impose your silly superstition or bullshit pseudoscience (usually bankrolled by superstition idiots feeding on the poison of religious thought and

IIf an abortion is being performed, the fetus was absolutely not invited in. It formed from the random interaction of a buncha sperm and a single egg, often times by accident. And given that it isn’t a baby and not human, it isn’t an invader but it certainly isn’t welcome, either. If it we’re invited, it would be

It ain't that either, chief.

Well good thing a 6 week old fetus isn’t a baby, then.

None of this is applicable because a six week grown fetus is not a human being anymore than a group of stem cells is a human being. It has no heartbeat (contrary to the lie you knowingly tell because fiction is an easier sell to idiots), most organs generally, possesses no neurological capabilities, and is,

No, but the having of human features like a heart, brain, and, I dunnp, the vast majority of organs sounds like a great starting point.

It’s called the 5 D’s of Kaiju Dodgeball, mayn. Dodge, duck, dip, dive, and dodge (the nuclear breathe from the gigantic lizard thing).

“Save...Mothra.”

Yes, but I would absolutely watch at least 3 movies about them having afternoon tea and at least one television spinoff about their child in the future having tea with various Toho monsters.

I mean, I’m not a genius, but it’s the vibe I get both from people I see do it and from my own misadventures with it once I’ve been honest and as objective as possible with myself. It always seems more like a method of control over the thought of our fellow primates than an honest assessment of the qualities of a

Thank you. It’s a solid B+ movie that was a fun watch in a theatre with some friends and a good rewatch at home with my parents and SO.

Ypu said he cited the same source as you but you cited no source here. Are you sure you were aware of the person you were talking to? Seems unlikely. That phrasing made me scratch my chin because I was like, “I don’t remember anything other than their opinion, no citations”.

But that’s not what he said or thinks. He just said not to impose a lifetime of medication on a child. Because they are children. Not deny them their transness or deaffirm their person Hood or shun them or tell them they aren’t something.

Christ, your anger is boring.

Oh. Then yeah, that all makes sense. Thank you, the other person made it seem much worse than that. In point or fact, I would say that I totally agree with him. Fancy that, the internet lied again.

Jesus fucking...come on!

As mentioned, being the Pope of the Church of Chris (Chrisianity), I must inform all of the good work of Evans, Pine, and Hemsworth.

Pope of the Church of Christ here, can confirm.

In the movie industry, they could just say he was wrong for the part and so long as they left no evidence to verify any anti-religious bias there would be no controversy beyond the usual dopes.

Besides which, he attends that bullshit Hillsong church with their pro conversion therapy nonsense. So I wouldn't say it's harmless.