The problem is there isn’t enough research to actually back that assertion.

Stores also have physical goods, need to pay employees to stock, transport, and damage out.

Steams just the easy punching bag because of its market position and the absurd cut they take. Epic will just keep hammering this home because its an easy win in their eyes. The cut is absurd, they’re making it clear that the cut they take is far less, and they get to sit on a high horse about their exclusives.

Features can be worked on.

What are the tangible negatives?

He donates so much money all over the socal area to promote music programs. I’d be shocked if he did any of that expecting a quid pro quo situation.

6 years!

The donation was 6 years ago specifically to build a music program.

With the way Netflix raises prices, Crunchyroll would never catch up to Netflix in price.

As someone else already mentioned, if they just kept up with inflation they’d be charging over 8 dollars a month.

Im honestly curious where people get the idea the core gameplay is so good having played a good chunk of time in it with Premier.

Considering Anthem feels like what they talked about Andromeda being, I’d say yes, yes they did.

Because its cheaper than fighting it and especially cheaper than fighting it and losing. There’s no thief in the night situation. No one stole anything. Stardock bought Atari and gained the rights to all the IP it owned. Unless those 2 can come up with a valid reason they owned the rights and not Atari then Stardock…

Honestly that’s what I was thinking. 5 dollars is such a weak apology amount after 2 different responses saying too bad so sad.

With The Sims, every expansion is relevant through every playthrough of the game. You may not always use it, but it’s there if you want to.

That’s a very recent change and when Forsaken released it really was 80 dollars to jump into it.

But its the same basic function.

Because its a journalists job to report on the truth.

So are a lot of governmental leaks.

Or, and stick with me here, its entirely possible they weighed the pros and cons of a long legal battle against a multimillion dollar company and realized, hey, we’ll probably lose far more fighting this even if we win than if we just donate to charity instead. Bonus points, Take Two doesn’t get their money for doing…