I can’t imagine what this could reefer to.
I can’t imagine what this could reefer to.
“Nah, read the article, still didn’t see how either of these people matter to me.”
“He probably should still be in jail”
“P.S. If you read this book by borrowing, stealing, or checking it out from your local library, then, dear reader, you are a worthless piece of shit worthy only of extermination. Have a lovely day!
*quickly amends rough draft to praise random people”
It can be two Janet Van Dyne things!
Uh . . . no. I didn’t not find it an effective horror film because it was such a goddamned shaggy dog story.
“To me, the movie is an exercise in weirdness just for weirdness sake and not a truly good film.”
Oh, btw . . . SPOILERS!!!!!
Everybody on the train got together and murdered a sled named Rosebud.
I disagree. I thought it followed its through-line pretty effectively, and it only seemed incomprehensible because it sidestepped the standard explanations and resolutions.
Ah, gotcha. I assumed it was a metaphorical reference to the creation of Jocasta, Ultron’s attempt to build an AI mate based on Janet Van Dyne.
I’m more worried about the dangers of actual Russell Crowe.
People who are really fanatics about dough, apparently.
Thank you. It’s never a complete thread without a statement of the blindingly obvious.
It would need to go unnamed because then people might post there specifically to skew the results.
Yes, because otherwise we’d have to admit we didn’t actually pay for the DLC.
To be fair, that describes most of Reddit.
So . . . it’s a shithole where nothing ever gets flushed.
. . . and now the MurderBots are actively posting to the AV Club.