Thank you. <3. *return huggles*

Never mind, I see from another if your comments exactly what you are. Dismissed.

I have seen more than enough evidence to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that Johnny Depp is a violent abuser.

Probably best understood in the literary sense. Substitute protagonist, or favorite character.

I don’t really follow those things, so I’d only ever heard of the hotel room, which I had assumed was playful rather than angry. I though he was doing that rock star thing, smashing stuff for fun because he knew he could afford it. :/

No...I don’t really follow celebrity personal lives at all. I looked all that up after Heard’s initial allegations and i was really disappointed with what I found. I know as little about Pitt’s past as I did Depp’s, but I’ve decided to not research this time. I’ll wait for the details on Jez and hope for the best.

I only knew about the hotel, and I’d always pictured it as playful rather than angry. He’s my second favorite actor so i spent hours going through old articles and reports after I read the allegations, and i wasn’t happy with what I found.

I’m in the middle of my own escape from an abuser who stopped just short of hitting me. It’s why I’m more alert to these things now than I used to be.

I had managed to miss most of the reports of Depp’s violence. Of heard about the hotel room, but I had assumed it was just rock star style fun...I was really sad to find out he was terrorizing Kate Moss that night.

That was my reaction too... Or hit things in the environment around the child. But I’m hoping that’s just awkward wording.

Johnny Depp didn’t strike me as a wife abuser until he struck his wife. :/

So....kids are going to love this character, and want to dress up as him. How exactly were they supposed to do that for a nearly naked character in a different way from this? I get the not darkening actual skin to match a character, but when there’s really no legitimate way to send kids out dressed as this character…

Didn’t she also just represent Johnny Depp? I have very little respect for people who defend abusers. I know someone has to, but I don’t feel like a decent person would want to be in that position.

So you not only haven’t been reading the articles about this case, you didn’t even read the very one you’re commenting on.

Supported by the initial court ruling, which now has no chance of being appealed because Cinemark used their considerable resources to bully the plaintiffs out of seeking a higher court’s opinion.

Or just, you know, close the door. The armed maniac would have faced more obstacles trying to return through the well-lit front entrance and might have been deterred.

Every theatre already has a security alarm system. Security alarm systems have door sensors.

You’ve noticed that too, hunh? It’s like Jez is full of Temporarily Embarrassed Millionaires today.

In reality, a reasonable person might believe that the cinema could have prevented a patron from being able to leave a door propped open for long enough to go out and arm himself in the fashion required to cause this much death and destruction.

Okay, at this point you’re deliberately misrepresenting what I said, and after this comment I’m not going to bother any further.