pileofashes
pileofashes
pileofashes

That’t not my point. You’re ignoring everything else I said about how a news website like this one works. This wasn’t an “updating” situation because this type of event doesn’t fall under that category. That is reserved for things being reported as they happen, like if they were in a hostage situation and this boy was

You know that Jezebel isn’t a breaking news service, right? They’re not local news, or the AP, or the NY Times, and they only cover “current” events a couple times a day. Most of their content is about things that occured several days in the past. Their sister site Gizmodo covered it much more quickly, which made

Pedantic nerd moment: Not all LARP is medieval or fantasy based. There are some set in the old west, in the present-day, and there’s a large network across North America that does a post-apocalyptic zombie setting, called Dystopia Rising (my personal favourite, because I have no patience for elves or vampires). But

I think you meant /r/TheRedPill but you typed Jezebel into your web browser. oops. how embarrassing for you.

How could I forget?! Also, we don’t like “nice guys” and instead always go for assholes.

This doesn’t make sense. So girls are what, 51% of the population? But the laws and practices “diproportionatelly” affect them? I mean on its face the statement is true, but if the meaning is that girls are being unfairly targeted, then the numbers do not back that up. Unless we are saying that like 50% of all

You’re right, this is all a feminazi plot to take away the power of poor, emasculated men. This is absolutely what feminist belief. It’s also unfair that men die earlier and have to go to war and work construction and women can sit at home and eat bon bons and have men protect them. Oh, and don’t forget to mention

Racism is not the same as rudeness. Also, it’s much worse.

Bernie Panders would never have won the general. Republicans wanted him to be the nominee because they had so much to attack him on and knew he would lose. Your white male savior Bernie lost the primary because fewer people voted for him and more people voted for Hillary. Just because you don’t like the facts doesn’t

There is zero factual proof of this, and it pains me to know so many butthurt gullible morons live on my side of the political spectrum who believe it.

Because the vast majority of Democratic primary voters voted for her.

“Something much of the left agrees with. Someone remind me why the DNC pretty much anointed her as the nominee again” Oh FFS, she was not anointed the nominee by the DNC. Democratic voters elected her resoundingly— she won the popular vote by double digits over Sanders.

If you believe all that garbage about HRC you’re as big a rube as those who voted for him. You bought the right wing propaganda hook, line, and sinker. The fact that the DNC pushed for an actual Democrat as opposed to an independent should shock no one, unless they’re stupid. It became clear early on that the Bernie

Someone remind me

That wasn’t the point I was making. Sanders was uncompetitive enough in the early primaries that it torpedoed his chances from the onset. (Enter complaints about money funneling and debate scheduling and superdelegate existence that Obama 2008 had little problems overcoming here.) There’s an alternate universe where

Because she got more votes in the primaries? I voted for Bernie Sanders in the MO primary by the way. Did the Democratic establishment prefer a longtime member with tons of experience and fairly Obama-style moderate views over the extremely liberal independent from Vermont (yes I know he caucuses with the party)? Yes.

I thought the unifying theme was a failure to properly understand and use the English language.

Yeah, the people who thought Hillary Clinton was a socialist would have absolutely voted for someone who calls himself one.

“Someone remind me why Sanders’ inner circle wrote off the South again?”