I guess not. I don't see enough design change here to justify a "thing".

NO. Not even close. There’s a huge difference between Cubism and DeStijl. There’s a very minor difference between “cab forward” and “a car”.

I don't see it. I understand weight distribution ratios, but this seems like too little a difference to require an entire new vehicle designation.

It's a negligable difference. I think this is a marketing concept more than an actual thing.

Don't ever change!

Need help here. Does this effect not require energy input? How can there be net energy gain?

Jeez. I'm feeling like this is a marketing concept rather than a real design difference.

Is the firewall behind the bottom of the windshield? 

This is maybe a 6 inch difference between where the windshield ends and the wheel well begins? I'm getting the impression that this difference is only important to engineers.

Windshield to wheel well ratio? I call BS.

I’m sorry, but I’ve never been able to see what makes a car “cab forward”. I have an art degree, for chrissakes, but I can’t see it. Can Torchinsky make some doodles or something?

Thanks, Obama.

Here's my hot take: I don't blame Jeep for trying, and I hope they lose.

Yes. Same category as "just needs a battery".

Not quite there pretty much sums up every experience I've ever had with a Nissan.

I cannot stand this narcissistic asshole. He and Trump deserve each other.

So are these Golf wagons actually Golf wagons, or are they rebranded Jettas?

I’m sorry David, but this attempted deflection is totally transparent.

oh jeebus, of course it’s an FRS

I hope he didn’t just throw it in the garbage can.